Cited by

Co. of America, 66 Minn. 79 , 68 N.W.

Co. 66 Minn. 79, 81 , ; Lathrop v. Schutte, 61 Minn. 196 , .

Co. 66 Minn. 79, ; Barrett v. Reardon, 95 Minn. 425 , ; Cody v. Longyear, 103 Minn. 116 , ; Dizonno v. Great Northern Ry.

Co. 66 Minn. 79 , ; Dizonno v. Great Northern Ry.

Co. 66 Minn. 79 , ; Aho v. Adriatic Mining Co. 117 Minn. 504 , ; Grbich v. Pittsburgh Iron Ore Co. 119 Minn. 365 , ; Johnson v. St.

Co. 66 Minn. 79 , ; Lohman v. Swift & Co. 105 Minn. 148 , .

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , , has no relevancy to the question, as that case relates to Laws 1895, p. 390, c. 173, which is confessedly a mere declaration of the common law.

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Renlund v. Commodore Mining Co., 89 Minn. 41 , , 99 Am.

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , , and Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , .

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , , where the company was liable upon the theory that at the time of the accident the employee was engaged in the performance of his duties as a superintendent or foreman, and represented his master.

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , ; Vogt v. Honstain, 81 Minn. 174 , ; Krumdick v. Chicago & N. W. Ry.

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , .

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , , and Yogt v. Honstain, 81 Minn. 174 , .

But this court, in the case of Soutar v. Minneapolis, supra, p. 18, the opinion in which was filed in this court at this term, held that this statute is merely declaratory of the common law and does not change the rules of law as to contributory negligence or assumption of risks by the servant, following the decision in Hess v. Adamant, 66 Minn. 79 .

Hess v. Adamant, 66 Minn. 79 , .