Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rosse v. St. Paul & Duluth Railway Co., 71 N.W. 20.

42 citing documents.

Steffey v. Soo Line Railroad 498 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Steffey v. Soo Line Railroad 498 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Paul & D. Ry., 68 Minn. 216, 218 , 71 N.W.
Thies v. St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Litchfield 489 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Thies v. St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Litchfield 489 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Paul & D. Ry., 68 Minn. 216, 218, 71 N.W.
O'Neal v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
O'Neal v. Burlington Northern, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul & Duluth Railway Co., 68 Minn. 216, 218 , 71 N.W.
Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591.
Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 66 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1954
Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 66 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1954
Co. 68 Minn. 216, 219 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, Mr. Justice Mitchell, speaking for the court, said: “* * * The decision is not a rule of property.
Alsaker v. DeGraff Lumber Co. 48 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1951
Alsaker v. DeGraff Lumber Co. 48 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1951
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591.
Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 A. S. R. 472; Akers v. C. St.
Middaugh v. Waseca Canning Co. 281 N.W. 818 Minn. 1938
Middaugh v. Waseca Canning Co. 281 N.W. 818 Minn. 1938
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 A. S. R. 472, this court held the fencing statute, though primarily designed to exclude stock from the right of way, should also be held for the protection of children non sui juris.
Pattridge v. Palmer 277 N.W. 18 Minn. 1937
Pattridge v. Palmer 277 N.W. 18 Minn. 1937
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , 71 N.W.
Arnao v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad 259 N.W. 12 Minn. 1935
Arnao v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railroad 259 N.W. 12 Minn. 1935
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 A. S. R. 472, where the decision in Fitzgerald v. St.
Fairchild v. Fleming 147 N.W. 434 Minn. 1914
Fairchild v. Fleming 147 N.W. 434 Minn. 1914
Co. 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L.R.A.
Evans v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 122 N.W. 876 Minn. 1909
Evans v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 122 N.W. 876 Minn. 1909
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 Am.
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 Am.
Mattes v. Great Northern Railway Co. 110 N.W. 98 Minn. 1907
Mattes v. Great Northern Railway Co. 110 N.W. 98 Minn. 1907
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , 37 L. R. A. 591, 64 Am.
Ellington v. Great Northern Railway Co. 104 N.W. 827 Minn. 1905
Ellington v. Great Northern Railway Co. 104 N.W. 827 Minn. 1905
Frisch v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 104 N.W. 228 Minn. 1905
Frisch v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 104 N.W. 228 Minn. 1905
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , it was held that section 2695 gave a cause of action for the killing of a child that had strayed upon the unfenced road of the defendant, overruling on this point the case of Fitzgerald v. St.
Schreiner v. Great Northern Railway Co. 90 N.W. 400 Minn. 1902
Schreiner v. Great Northern Railway Co. 90 N.W. 400 Minn. 1902
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , ; Nickolson v. Northern Pacific Ry.
Fezler v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co. 88 N.W. 746 Minn. 1902
Fezler v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co. 88 N.W. 746 Minn. 1902
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , it was held that the statute requiring railway companies to fence their roads was not exclusively designed to prevent domestic animals from straying upon their tracks, but was applicable *255 in cases-where young children, non sui juris, stray upon tracks and receive injuries in consequence of the fail
Marengo v. Great Northern Railway Co. 87 N.W. 1117 Minn. 1901
Marengo v. Great Northern Railway Co. 87 N.W. 1117 Minn. 1901
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , ; Nickolson v. Northern Pac.
Nickolson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 83 N.W. 454 Minn. 1900
Overruled Nickolson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 83 N.W. 454 Minn. 1900
Co., 68 Minn. 216 , , the Fitzgerald case was overruled, and it was held that the broad language *512 of the amendment of 1877 to the statute imposing liability in all cases was sufficient to render a company liable for all damages in case of a failure or neglect to fence.
Hamilton v. Minneapolis Desk Manufacturing Co. 80 N.W. 693 Minn. 1899
Hamilton v. Minneapolis Desk Manufacturing Co. 80 N.W. 693 Minn. 1899