Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Howard, 68 N.W. 1096.

38 citing documents.

State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
State v. Pratt 152 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1967
4 State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178.
State v. Oman 121 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1963
State v. Oman 121 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1963
5 Our decision must be controlled by State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178.
State v. Wurdemann 120 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1963
State v. Wurdemann 120 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1963
E. g., State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178.
State v. Eich 282 N.W. 810 Minn. 1938
State v. Eich 282 N.W. 810 Minn. 1938
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 A. S. R. 403.
Pattridge v. Palmer 277 N.W. 18 Minn. 1937
State v. Lopes, Sr. 275 N.W. 374 Minn. 1937
State v. Lopes, Sr. 275 N.W. 374 Minn. 1937
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 A. S. R. 403; State v. Clements, 82 Minn. 448 , .
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
In State v. Holong, 38 Minn. 368 , , it was said that the statute was enacted to free criminal pleading from the technical rules of the common law; and in State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 A. S. R. 403, that if the charging part of an indictment states facts showing the commission of a crime by the defendant, the law determines its name and nature and a misnomer of the crime does not affect the validity of the indictment.
State v. Isaacson 193 N.W. 694 Minn. 1923
State v. Isaacson 193 N.W. 694 Minn. 1923
State v. McIntyre, 19 Minn. 65 (93), State v. Ruhnke, 27 Minn. 309 , ; State v. Heitsch, 29 Minn. 134 , ; State v. Cody, 65 Minn. 121 , ; State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. Danaher 169 N.W. 420 Minn. 1918
State v. Danaher 169 N.W. 420 Minn. 1918
The rule stated in State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309, 312 , , does not apply, and the case is not in point.
State v. Rolph 167 N.W. 553 Minn. 1918
State v. Rolph 167 N.W. 553 Minn. 1918
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L.R.A.
State v. Mayo 136 N.W. 849 Minn. 1912
State v. Mayo 136 N.W. 849 Minn. 1912
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L.R.A.
State v. Rosenfield 126 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1910
State v. Rosenfield 126 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1910
State v. Abrisch, 41 Minn. 41 , ; State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. Swanson 119 N.W. 45 Minn. 1908
State v. Swanson 119 N.W. 45 Minn. 1908
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. MacDonald 117 N.W. 482 Minn. 1908
State v. MacDonald 117 N.W. 482 Minn. 1908
State v. McIntyre, 19 Minn. 65 (93); State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. Sager 108 N.W. 812 Minn. 1906
State v. Quackenbush 108 N.W. 953 Minn. 1906
State v. Quackenbush 108 N.W. 953 Minn. 1906
State v. Cody, 65 Minn. 121 , ; State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. Sager 108 N.W. 812 Minn. 1906
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , , 34 L. R. A. 178, 61 Am.
State v. Ames 98 N.W. 190 Minn. 1904
State v. Clements 85 N.W. 234 Minn. 1901
State v. Clements 85 N.W. 234 Minn. 1901
The statute dispenses with mere formality and technicality, but the requirement that the indictment must be direct and certain as regards the offense, and the particular cir-’ cumstances thereof, is imperative.” State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309, 312 , .
State v. Bradford 81 N.W. 202 Minn. 1899
State v. Bradford 81 N.W. 202 Minn. 1899
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , ; State v. Abrisch, 41 Minn. 41 , .
State v. O'Neil 73 N.W. 1091 Minn. 1898
State v. O'Neil 73 N.W. 1091 Minn. 1898
State v. Howard, 66 Minn. 309 , .