Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co., 69 N.W. 1.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Tyson Joe Hinckley Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Tyson Joe Hinckley Minn. 2024
In Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co., we held that prima facie evidence is established in circumstances in which the evidence proves a fact 10 “in the absence of any opposing, suspicious circumstances.” (citing Wright v. Larson, 53 N.W.
Mason City Production Credit Ass'n v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 286 N.W. 713 Minn. 1939
Mason City Production Credit Ass'n v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 286 N.W. 713 Minn. 1939
First Farmers State Bank, by Peyton v. Crosby 256 N.W. 315 Minn. 1934
First Farmers State Bank, by Peyton v. Crosby 256 N.W. 315 Minn. 1934
Co. 66 Minn. 344 , ; Partridge v. Minnesota & D. Elev.
Watson v. Koochiching Realty Co. 208 N.W. 11 Minn. 1926
Watson v. Koochiching Realty Co. 208 N.W. 11 Minn. 1926
Co. 66 Minn. 344 , ; St.
Singer v. Farmers State Bank of Goodridge 201 N.W. 414 Minn. 1924
Singer v. Farmers State Bank of Goodridge 201 N.W. 414 Minn. 1924
St. Paul Electric Co. v. Baldwin Engineering Co. 199 N.W. 9 Minn. 1924
St. Paul Electric Co. v. Baldwin Engineering Co. 199 N.W. 9 Minn. 1924
Ludlum v. Rothschild, 41 Minn. 218 , ; Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co. 66 Minn. 344 , .
Wilson v. Geiss 190 N.W. 61 Minn. 1922
Wilson v. Geiss 190 N.W. 61 Minn. 1922
Co. 66 Minn. 344 , ; Partridge v. Minnesota & D. Elev.
Hillsdale Distillery Co. v. Briant 152 N.W. 265 Minn. 1915
Hillsdale Distillery Co. v. Briant 152 N.W. 265 Minn. 1915
Brandenburg v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit Bureau 151 N.W. 134 Minn. 1915
Brandenburg v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit Bureau 151 N.W. 134 Minn. 1915
Kronschnable v. Knoblauch, 21 Minn. 56 ; Kenrick v. Rogers, 26 Minn. 344 , ; Homberger v. Brandenberg, 35 Minn. 401 , ; Adams v. Castle, 64 Minn. 505 , ; Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co. 66 Minn. 344, 349 , .
Endreson v. Larson 112 N.W. 628 Minn. 1907
Endreson v. Larson 112 N.W. 628 Minn. 1907
In support of these propositions we are cited to Hogan v. Atlantic Elevator Co., 66 Minn. 344 , , and Partridge v. Minnesota & Dakota Elevator Co., 75 Minn. 496 , .
Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 103 N.W. 704 Minn. 1905
Leitch v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 103 N.W. 704 Minn. 1905
Baylor v. Butterfass 84 N.W. 640 Minn. 1900
Baylor v. Butterfass 84 N.W. 640 Minn. 1900
Co., 66 Minn. 344 , , and similar cases in the earlier reports, on principle, would seem to sustain the mortgage; while the case of Steinbach v. Brant, 79 Minn. 383 , , points in the other direction.
Partridge v. Minnesota & Dakota Elevator Co. 78 N.W. 85 Minn. 1899
Partridge v. Minnesota & Dakota Elevator Co. 78 N.W. 85 Minn. 1899
Co., 66 Minn. 344 , ; Jones, Chat.