Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Great Northern Railway Co., 71 N.W. 5.

38 citing documents.

Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , ; Sullivan v. Minneapolis St.
Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 217 N.W. 102 Minn. 1927
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , 71 N.W.
Cetkowski v. Knutson 204 N.W. 528 Minn. 1925
Cetkowski v. Knutson 204 N.W. 528 Minn. 1925
Co. 64 Minn. 390 , , , 58 Am.
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , ; Manning v. St.
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 186 N.W. 123 Minn. 1921
Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co. 186 N.W. 123 Minn. 1921
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , ; where an awning fell, Waller v. Ross, 100 Minn. 7 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Manning v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 160 N.W. 787 Minn. 1916
Manning v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 160 N.W. 787 Minn. 1916
Co. 68 Minn. 155, 161 , ; Rose v. Minneapolis, St.
Wiles v. Great Northern Railway Co. 147 N.W. 427 Minn. 1914
Wiles v. Great Northern Railway Co. 147 N.W. 427 Minn. 1914
Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. 144 N.W. 434 Minn. 1913
Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. 144 N.W. 434 Minn. 1913
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , ; Rase v. Minneapolis St.
Rose v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 141 N.W. 487 Minn. 1913
Rose v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 141 N.W. 487 Minn. 1913
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , ; 4 Notes to Minn, cases 244.
Hartikka v. D. G. Cutler Co. 135 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1912
Hartikka v. D. G. Cutler Co. 135 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1912
Co. 68 Minn. 155 , , in its substantial facts, is similar to the case at bar, and it was there held that the unexplained movement of the cars left standing was prima facie evidence of negligence.
Owens v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 128 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1910
Owens v. Chicago Great Western Railroad 128 N.W. 1011 Minn. 1910
Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Gilruth 122 N.W. 466 Minn. 1909
Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Gilruth 122 N.W. 466 Minn. 1909
Co., 64 Minn. 390 , , , 58 Am.
Halvorson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 116 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1908
Halvorson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 116 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1908
Co., 68 Minn. 155 , , the trial court was justified in denying the motion for judgment in favor of the defendant notwithstanding the verdict for the plaintiff.
Neitge v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 114 N.W. 467 Minn. 1908
Neitge v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 114 N.W. 467 Minn. 1908
Co., 68 Minn. 155, 159 , ; Isherwood v. H. L. Jenkins Lumber Co., 84 Minn. 423 , .
Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 111 N.W. 254 Minn. 1907
Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 111 N.W. 254 Minn. 1907
Co., 68 Minn. 155, 161 , ), that it would be idle to collate relevant authorities.
Ulseth v. Crookston Lumber Co. 106 N.W. 307 Minn. 1906
Ulseth v. Crookston Lumber Co. 106 N.W. 307 Minn. 1906
Co., 68 Minn. 155 , , and other decisions of this court, that when the thing causing the accident is shown to be in the possession or under the control of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management thereof use proper care, it will be presumed
Kohout v. Newman 104 N.W. 764 Minn. 1905
Kohout v. Newman 104 N.W. 764 Minn. 1905
Co., 68 Minn. 155, 159, ; Steindorff v. St.
Isherwood v. H. L. Jenkins Lumber Co. 87 N.W. 931 Minn. 1901
Isherwood v. H. L. Jenkins Lumber Co. 87 N.W. 931 Minn. 1901
Johnson v. Walsh 85 N.W. 910 Minn. 1901
Johnson v. Walsh 85 N.W. 910 Minn. 1901
Co., 68 Minn. 155, 161 , .