Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of Chatfield, 71 N.W. 696.

32 citing documents.

Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 450 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1990
Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp. 450 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1990
Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Ass’n, 69 Minn. 14, 16-17 , 71 N.W.
Stroncek v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company 193 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1971
Stroncek v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company 193 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1971
ble, with due regard to his health, to occasionally perform some single and trivial act connected with some kind of business pertaining to his occupation as a merchant would not render his disability partial instead of total, provided he was unable, substantially or to some material extent, to transact any kind of business pertaining to such occupation.” Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14, 17 , .
Struble v. Occidental Life Insurance 120 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1963
Struble v. Occidental Life Insurance 120 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1963
In Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, we aligned ourselves with those authorities which have rejected the literal approach in the construction of insurance policies 3 which provide for compensation in the event of total disability.
Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
The wording of the policy in the instant case is nearly identical with the wording of the policy in Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537.
Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n 54 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1952
Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n 54 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1952
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L.R.A.
Fine v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 274 N.W. 163 Minn. 1937
Fine v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 274 N.W. 163 Minn. 1937
Aid Assn. 69 Minn, 14, 15, 17, , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542, where the rule was stated to be that total disability exists where there is an inability, “substantially or to some material extent,” to transact any kind of business pertaining to such occupation.
Lorentz v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 266 N.W. 699 Minn. 1936
Lorentz v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 266 N.W. 699 Minn. 1936
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542; Carson v. New York L. Ins.
Kerkela v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 260 N.W. 300 Minn. 1935
Kerkela v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 260 N.W. 300 Minn. 1935
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14, 16 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542, that “total disability does not mean absolute physical inability * * to transact any kind of business” pertaining to the occupation of the insured.
Koeberl v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 252 N.W. 419 Minn. 1934
Koeberl v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 252 N.W. 419 Minn. 1934
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 88 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542.
Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 245 N.W. 826 Minn. 1932
Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 245 N.W. 826 Minn. 1932
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge O. C. K. 88 Minn. 224 , ; Hayes v. North American L. & C. Co. 151 Minn. 124 , ; Carson v. New York L. Ins.
Jones v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 207 N.W. 179 Minn. 1926
Jones v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 207 N.W. 179 Minn. 1926
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 Am.
Carson v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 209 Minn. 1925
Carson v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 209 Minn. 1925
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 Am.
Hayes v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 186 N.W. 136 Minn. 1922
Hayes v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 186 N.W. 136 Minn. 1922
It is sufficient if bis injuries were of such a char *127 acter that common care and prudence required him to desist from the transaction of any such, business so long as it was reasonably necessary to effectuate a cure.” Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 Am.
Aaberg v. Minnesota Commercial Men's Ass'n 173 N.W. 708 Minn. 1919
Aaberg v. Minnesota Commercial Men's Ass'n 173 N.W. 708 Minn. 1919
As there must be a new trial on other grounds, it is sufficient to say that the rule applicable is elucidated in Lobdill v. Laboring Men’s Mutual Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L.R.A.
Collopy v. Modern Brotherhood 158 N.W. 625 Minn. 1916
Collopy v. Modern Brotherhood 158 N.W. 625 Minn. 1916
Aid Assn. of Chatfield, 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L.R.A.
Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian Knights 92 N.W. 972 Minn. 1903
Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian Knights 92 N.W. 972 Minn. 1903
Aid Assn., 69 Minn. 14 , .