Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Luria v. Wagener, 72 N.W. 67.

28 citing documents.

Johnson v. Donovan 188 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1971
Johnson v. Donovan 188 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1971
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , involved an attempt to regulate peddlers; State ex rel.
Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, wherein a statute purporting to license and regulate hawkers and peddlers throughout the state was held unconstitutional.
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677.
State v. Marcus 299 N.W. 241 Minn. 1941
State v. Marcus 299 N.W. 241 Minn. 1941
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 A. S. R. 565; State v. Jensen, 93 Minn. 88 , .
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 A. S. R. 565, it was held that a statute which provided that no person should be allowed to sell any personal property as a peddler or hawker without first obtaining a license therefor was unconstitutional because it further provided that the act should not be construed to preve
State Ex Rel. Remick v. Clousing 285 N.W. 711 Minn. 1939
State Ex Rel. Remick v. Clousing 285 N.W. 711 Minn. 1939
Luria v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 A. S. R. 565; State ex rel.
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 Am.
State v. Dirnberger 187 N.W. 972 Minn. 1922
State v. Dirnberger 187 N.W. 972 Minn. 1922
650; State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 Am.
Fairley v. City of Duluth 185 N.W. 390 Minn. 1921
Fairley v. City of Duluth 185 N.W. 390 Minn. 1921
State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L.R.A.
State v. Elliott 160 N.W. 204 Minn. 1916
State v. Elliott 160 N.W. 204 Minn. 1916
393 , and State v. Wagner, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Mudeking v. Parr 123 N.W. 408 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Mudeking v. Parr 123 N.W. 408 Minn. 1909
ght or lien, nor to the sale by-any individual of any article grown' [or] produced by him.” Section 10: “No license under this act shall be required of any person for carrying on his business or calling in any city of this state having a population of 50,000, or over, when he has been duly licensed thereto by such city.” At the time of the passage of this act it had been held in State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 Am.
State ex rel. Greenwood v. Nolan 122 N.W. 255 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Greenwood v. Nolan 122 N.W. 255 Minn. 1909
State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , 38 L. R. A. 677, 65 Am.
State v. Jensen 100 N.W. 644 Minn. 1904
State v. Jensen 100 N.W. 644 Minn. 1904
We so held in the case of State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 209 , .
State v. Johnson 90 N.W. 161 Minn. 1902
State v. Johnson 90 N.W. 161 Minn. 1902
The case of State v. Wagener, 69 Minn. 206 , , relied upon by defendant, is not here in point.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by