Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co., 77 N.W. 38.

36 citing documents.

Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
& Water Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , ; Minneapolis, St.
Phillips v. Brandt 43 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1950
Phillips v. Brandt 43 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1950
& Water Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , ; Williams v. Klemmer, 177 Minn. 44 , ; Cranak v. Link, 219 Minn. 112 , 17 N. W. (2d) 359 .
Kuehn v. Village of Mahtomedi 292 N.W. 187 Minn. 1940
Kuehn v. Village of Mahtomedi 292 N.W. 187 Minn. 1940
While not directly in point yet helpful by analogy and reason are our own cases: Long v. City of Duluth, 49 Minn. 280 , , 32 A. S. R. 547, and Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , .
Regan v. Babcock 247 N.W. 12 Minn. 1933
Regan v. Babcock 247 N.W. 12 Minn. 1933
73 ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. W. Co. 74 Minn. 180 , 185 , 77 N.W.
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 242 N.W. 714 Minn. 1932
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 242 N.W. 714 Minn. 1932
Because of the statutes noAv controlling, Ave have no occasion to consider the general principles that otherwise might be applicable and which were discussed in Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , ; and Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , .
Consolidated School District No. 30 v. Christison 208 N.W. 409 Minn. 1926
Consolidated School District No. 30 v. Christison 208 N.W. 409 Minn. 1926
Todd v. Rustad, 43 Minn. 500 , ; Streissguth v. Geib, 67 Minn. 360 , ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , ; School District No. 135 v. McConnell, 150 Minn. 57 , ; Jensen v. Independent Sch.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Village of Le Roy 144 N.W. 464 Minn. 1913
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Village of Le Roy 144 N.W. 464 Minn. 1913
& Water Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , .
Arpin v. City of Thief River Falls 141 N.W. 833 Minn. 1913
Arpin v. City of Thief River Falls 141 N.W. 833 Minn. 1913
Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co. 74 Minn. 180 , , ; Grannis v. Board of Commrs.
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
State v. Spaude, 37 Minn. 322 , ; Cobb v. Bord, 40 Minn. 479 , ; Flynn v. Dittle Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , ; State v. City of Thief River Falls, 76 Minn. 15 , ; Alexander v. City of Duluth, 77 Minn. 445 , ; State v. Ames, 87 Minn. 23 , ; Kaiser v. Campbell, 90 Minn. 375 , ; State v. Gunn, 92 Minn. 436 , ; Merchants’ Nat.
Merchants National Bank v. City of East Grand Forks 102 N.W. 703 Minn. 1905
Merchants National Bank v. City of East Grand Forks 102 N.W. 703 Minn. 1905
State v. City of Lake City, 25 Minn. 404 ; Kunkle v. Town of Franklin, 13 Minn. 119 (127); and see Nash v. Lowry, 37 Minn. 261 , ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , ; People v. Burr, 13 Cal.
State ex rel. Skyllingstad v. Gunn 100 N.W. 97 Minn. 1904
State ex rel. Skyllingstad v. Gunn 100 N.W. 97 Minn. 1904
& W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , .
Schiffmann v. City of St. Paul 92 N.W. 503 Minn. 1902
Schiffmann v. City of St. Paul 92 N.W. 503 Minn. 1902
of Winona Co., 23 Minn. 404 ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , ; Farmer v. City of St.
Reed v. City of Anoka 88 N.W. 981 Minn. 1902
Cone v. Wold 88 N.W. 977 Minn. 1902
Cone v. Wold 88 N.W. 977 Minn. 1902
Paul, 69 Minn. 276 , ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , ; Bailey v. Strachan, 77 Minn. 526 , .
Reed v. City of Anoka 88 N.W. 981 Minn. 1902
It was so held in the case of Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , , .
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. 83 N.W. 32 Minn. 1900
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. 83 N.W. 32 Minn. 1900
uthorities to contract in relation to a given matter does not carry with it, by implication, power to make a contract, even with reference to such matter, which shall cede away, control, or embarrass their legislative or governmental powers, or render the municipality unable in the future to control any municipal matter over which it has legislative control (Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180, 186 , , 78 N.W.
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 81 N.W. 200 Minn. 1899
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 81 N.W. 200 Minn. 1899
Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , .
Alexander v. City of Duluth 80 N.W. 623 Minn. 1899
Alexander v. City of Duluth 80 N.W. 623 Minn. 1899
Cobb v. Bord, 40 Minn. 479 , ; State v. Cooley, 56 Minn. 548 , ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , ; State v. City of Thief River Falls, 76 Minn. 15 , ; Iowa v. Soper, 39 Iowa, 112 ; 32 Am.
State ex rel. Lee v. City of Thief River Falls 78 N.W. 867 Minn. 1899
State ex rel. Lee v. City of Thief River Falls 78 N.W. 867 Minn. 1899
State v. Cooley, 56 Minn. 540, 548 ; ; Flynn v. Little Falls E. & W. Co., 74 Minn. 180 , ; Iowa v. Soper, 39 Iowa, 112 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by