Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co., 69 N.W. 640.

225 citing documents.

Russell v. German Fire Insurance 111 N.W. 400 Minn. 1907
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , , it was said: “Consequences which follow in unbroken sequence, without an intervening efficient cause, from the original negligent act, are natural and proximate.” Again, in Strobeck v. Bren, 93 Minn. 428 , , the following definition of proximate cause was adopted: “The proximate cauée of
Paquin v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. 108 N.W. 882 Minn. 1906
Paquin v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. 108 N.W. 882 Minn. 1906
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , ; La.
Hebert v. Interstate Iron Co. 102 N.W. 451 Minn. 1905
Hebert v. Interstate Iron Co. 102 N.W. 451 Minn. 1905
Jensen v. Commodore Mining Co. 101 N.W. 944 Minn. 1904
Jensen v. Commodore Mining Co. 101 N.W. 944 Minn. 1904
Strobeck v. Bren 101 N.W. 795 Minn. 1904
Strobeck v. Bren 101 N.W. 795 Minn. 1904
McGinty v. Waterman 101 N.W. 300 Minn. 1904
McGinty v. Waterman 101 N.W. 300 Minn. 1904
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , ; Keegan v. Minneapolis & St.
Simonson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 92 N.W. 459 Minn. 1902
Simonson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 92 N.W. 459 Minn. 1902
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , ; Keegan v. Minneapolis & St.
Schus v. Powers-Simpson Co. 85 Minn. 447 Minn. 1902
Schus v. Powers-Simpson Co. 85 Minn. 447 Minn. 1902
Butler-Ryan Co. v. Williams 88 N.W. 3 Minn. 1901
Butler-Ryan Co. v. Williams 88 N.W. 3 Minn. 1901
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , ; Wallin v. Eastern Ry.
Wallin v. Eastern Railway Co. 86 N.W. 76 Minn. 1901
Wallin v. Eastern Railway Co. 86 N.W. 76 Minn. 1901
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , , it appears that a rule of that company was in force which required hand cars to be kept apart for a distance of five hundred forty feet.
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co. 85 N.W. 826 Minn. 1901
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co. 85 N.W. 826 Minn. 1901
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , ; Keegan v. Minneapolis & St.
Keegan v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 78 N.W. 965 Minn. 1899
Keegan v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 78 N.W. 965 Minn. 1899
Co., 67 Minn. 94 , , and point out the distinction in that respect between actions in tort and actions on contract.
Hughley v. City of Wabasha 72 N.W. 78 Minn. 1897
Hughley v. City of Wabasha 72 N.W. 78 Minn. 1897
In view of what is said in the memorandum of the judge on the subject of proximate cause, it may be well, with reference to another trial, to call attention to what is said by this court in the third subdivision of the opinion in Christianson v. Chicago, 67 Minn. 94 , .