DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brandes v. Carpenter, 71 N.W. 402.

34 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Mangni 43 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
  • State Ex Rel. Sawyer v. Mangni 43 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Lloyd v. Simons, 97 Minn. 315 , ; Sinell v. Town of Sharon, 206 Minn. 437 , ; Elsen v. State Farmers Mut.
  • Kemmetmueller v. Zachman 18 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1945
  • Kemmetmueller v. Zachman 18 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1945
    and settled according to law.” Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , , 5 Ann. Cas.
  • Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
  • Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388, 390 , ; Schmitt v. Hager, 88 Minn. 413, 415 , ; Brockman v. Brockman, 133 Minn. 148, 152 , ; Mackall v. Casilear, 137 U. S. 556, 566 , 11 S. Ct. 178 , 34 L. ed. 776.
  • Sinell v. Town of Sharon 289 N.W. 44 Minn. 1939
  • Sinell v. Town of Sharon 289 N.W. 44 Minn. 1939
    This is but applying “the maxim that equity aids the vigilant, and not the negligent.” Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388, 390, 391 , .
  • In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
  • Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
  • Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388, 391 , .
  • In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , 391 , 71 N.W.
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Tessum 228 N.W. 326 Minn. 1929
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Tessum 228 N.W. 326 Minn. 1929
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , 71 N.W.
  • Zimmerman v. American Surety Co. 227 N.W. 355 Minn. 1929
  • Zimmerman v. American Surety Co. 227 N.W. 355 Minn. 1929
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Sweet v. Lowry, 123 Minn. 13 , , 47 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Boling v. Dickinson 210 N.W. 875 Minn. 1926
  • Boling v. Dickinson 210 N.W. 875 Minn. 1926
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Dickman v. Dryden, 90 Minn. 244 , ; Sweet v. Lowry, 123 Minn. 13 , , 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451; Sweet v. Lowry, 131 Minn. 109 , ; Brockman v. Brockman, 133 Minn. 148 , ; In re Estate of Barlow v. Bar
  • Appeal of Anderson v. Barlow 188 N.W. 282 Minn. 1922
  • Appeal of Anderson v. Barlow 188 N.W. 282 Minn. 1922
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Coleman v. Akers, 87 Minn. 492 , ; Dickman v. Dryden, 90 Minn. 244 , ; Sweet v. Lowry, 123 Minn. 13 , , 47 L. R. A. (N. *253 S.) 451; Sweet v. Lowry, 131 Minn. 109 , ; Brockman v. Brockman, 133 Minn.
  • Brockman v. Brockman 157 N.W. 1086 Minn. 1916
  • State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
  • State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
    State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Mnfg.
  • Brockman v. Brockman 157 N.W. 1086 Minn. 1916
    Marcotte v. Hartman, 46 Minn. 202 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , 71 N W. 402; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Sweet v. Lowry, 131 Minn. 109 , .
  • Sweet v. Lowry 154 N.W. 793 Minn. 1915
  • Sweet v. Lowry 154 N.W. 793 Minn. 1915
    Marcotte v. Hartman, 46 Minn. 202 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Schmitt v. Hager, 88 Minn. 413 , ; but, where the facts are such as would ordinarily be known to him, he must plead want of knowledge on his part.
  • Sweet v. Lowry 142 N.W. 882 Minn. 1913
  • Sweet v. Lowry 142 N.W. 882 Minn. 1913
    The folbwjng Minnesota cases are pertinent upon the question of laches: Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , ; Marcotte v. Hartman, 46 Minn. 202 , ; Sanborn v. Eads, 38 Minn. 211 , .
  • Appleby v. Watkins 104 N.W. 301 Minn. 1905
  • Appleby v. Watkins 104 N.W. 301 Minn. 1905
    It has been held in the following cases that this jurisdiction is exclusive: State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Boltz v. Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , .
  • Dickman v. Dryden 95 N.W. 1120 Minn. 1903
  • Dickman v. Dryden 95 N.W. 1120 Minn. 1903
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Hanson v. Swenson, 77 Minn. 70 , .
  • Hanson v. Swenson 79 N.W. 598 Minn. 1899
  • Hanson v. Swenson 79 N.W. 598 Minn. 1899
    Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Taylor v. Whitney, 56 Minn. 386 , ; Barnwell v. Barnwell, 2 Hill, Eq.