Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440.

32 citing documents.

In Re Wretlind 32 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1948
Hatton v. State 32 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1948
In Re Wretlind 32 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1948
*Page 565 Applying this rule to district court proceedings requiring service of summons, in Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , 72 N.W.
Hatton v. State 32 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1948
*565 Applying this rule to district court proceedings requiring service of summons, in Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , , we stated: “An action may be maintained to set aside a judgment valid on its face on the ground that the summons was never served on the defendant.
Siewert v. O'Brien 278 N.W. 162 Minn. 1938
Siewert v. O'Brien 278 N.W. 162 Minn. 1938
Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of Melgaard 274 N.W. 641 Minn. 1937
In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of Melgaard 274 N.W. 641 Minn. 1937
See Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Dewolf v. Ericson 220 N.W. 406 Minn. 1928
Dewolf v. Ericson 220 N.W. 406 Minn. 1928
In Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , , it was held that a judgment of a justice of the peace might be attacked when there was no jurisdiction by answer when suit was brought upon it in the district court.
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , ; Kueffner v. Gottfried, 154 Minn. 70 , .
Kueffner v. Gottfried 191 N.W. 271 Minn. 1922
Kueffner v. Gottfried 191 N.W. 271 Minn. 1922
To overcome its effect as prima facie evidence, the proofs must be “clear and satisfactory,” Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Allen v. McIntyre, 56 Minn. 351 , ; Lunschen v. Peterson, 120 Minn. 288 , ; “clear and practically conclusive,” Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , ; “positive, satisfactory and convincing,” Osman v. Wisted, 78 Minn. 295 , ; “unequivocal, clear and convincing,” Oertel v. Pierce, 116 Minn. 266 , , Ann. Cas.
Whitney v. Welnitz 190 N.W. 57 Minn. 1922
Whitney v. Welnitz 190 N.W. 57 Minn. 1922
Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Lunschen v. Peterson 139 N.W. 506 Minn. 1913
Lunschen v. Peterson 139 N.W. 506 Minn. 1913
This instruction is conceded to be correct by appellant, and in accord with the rulings of the court in Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Allen v. McIntyre, 56 Minn. 351 , ; Knutson v. Davies, 51 Minn. 363 , , and Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Oertel v. Pierce 133 N.W. 797 Minn. 1911
Oertel v. Pierce 133 N.W. 797 Minn. 1911
While it is true that courts should proceed with caution in overturning the certificate of an officer charged with the duty of serving process, and should require unequivocal, clear, and convincing evidence of the falsity of the returns attacked before doing so (Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , ; Osman v. Wisted, 78 Minn. 295 , ), yet the rule guiding this court in respect to the review of the findings of a trial court in such cases remains the same.
Cremer v. Michelet 131 N.W. 627 Minn. 1911
Cremer v. Michelet 131 N.W. 627 Minn. 1911
In Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , , it is stated: “Whatever question upon the subject there may be in other jurisdictions, it is settled in this state that an action in equity may be maintained to set aside a judgment upon the ground that the summons was never served upon the defendant, and the officer’s return of service shown to be fa
Stevenson v. Murphy 119 N.W. 47 Minn. 1908
Stevenson v. Murphy 119 N.W. 47 Minn. 1908
Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Glauber v. Wallace 116 N.W. 107 Minn. 1908
Distinguished Glauber v. Wallace 116 N.W. 107 Minn. 1908
The case of Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , , is distinguishable.
Crosby v. Scott-Graff Lumber Co. 101 N.W. 610 Minn. 1904
Crosby v. Scott-Graff Lumber Co. 101 N.W. 610 Minn. 1904
Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Stai v. Selden 92 N.W. 6 Minn. 1902
Stai v. Selden 92 N.W. 6 Minn. 1902
Attack, §§ 2, 3; Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .
Deering v. Poston 80 N.W. 783 Minn. 1899
Deering v. Poston 80 N.W. 783 Minn. 1899
Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .