Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kral v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co., 74 N.W. 166.

41 citing documents.

Boland v. Garber 257 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1977
Paul City Railway Co., 71 Minn. 438
Jacoboski v. Prax 187 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1971
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 451 , , 70 A. S. R. 341: “ ‘It is sometimes said that the plaintiff may be entitled to recover if the defendant might, by the exercise of care, have avoided the consequences of the plaintiff’s negligence.
Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Company 176 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , ); that defendant had actual knowledge of plaintiff’s dangerous position in the sense that defendant realized plaintiff’s predicament (Carlson v. Sanitary *281 Farm Dairies, Inc. 200 Minn. 177 , ); and after such realization, had sufficient time and the then-existing ability to avoid the collision.
Bymark v. Englert 168 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1969
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , ; Kmetz v. Johnson, 261 Minn. 395, 403 , 113 N. W. (2d) 96, 101 .
Koval v. Thompson 136 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1965
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , ); that defendant had actual knowledge of plaintiff’s dangerous position in the sense that defendant realized plaintiff’s predicament (Carlson v. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. 200 Minn. 177 , ); and after such realization, had sufficient time and the then-existing ability to avoid the collision.
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 452 , .
Connolly v. Nicollet Hotel 104 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1960
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , ; Schultz v. Swift & Co. 210 Minn. 533 , .
Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 74 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1956
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A. S. R. 341.
Ellerman v. Skelly Oil Co. 34 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1948
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A. S. R. 341; Merrill v. St.
Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 25 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1946
Co. 71 Minn. 488, 451 , , 70 A. S. R. 341.
Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1946
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A. S. R. 341.
Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc. 16 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 1944
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A. S. R. 341; Carlson v. Connecticut Co. 94 Conn. 131 , 108 A. 531 , 8 A. L. R. 569, and annotation; 35 Am.
Peyla v. Duluth, Missabe Iron Range Railroad Co. 15 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1944
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 445 , , 70 A. S. R. 341, where plaintiff crossed a street in front of two streetcars approaching: from opposite directions: “The strongest argument that can be advanced against the plaintiff’s conduct is that he did not continue to watch the west-bound car after he left the curb to cross Seventh street.
Turenne v. Smith 9 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1943
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 451 , , 70 A. S. R. 341: “It is sometimes said that the plaintiff may be entitled to recover if the defendant might, by the exercise of care, have avoided the consequences of the plaintiff’s negligence.
Vorlicky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 287 N.W. 109 Minn. 1939
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A. S. R. 341; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
M & M Securities Co. v. Dirnberger 250 N.W. 801 Minn. 1933
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 A.S.R.
Knott v. Hawley 203 N.W. 785 Minn. 1925
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 452 , , 70 Am.
Young v. Avery Co. 170 N.W. 693 Minn. 1919
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 446 , , 70 Am.
Johnson v. Johnson 163 N.W. 160 Minn. 1917
Paul City R. Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 Am.
McKenzie v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 155 N.W. 758 Minn. 1915
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 Am.
Lawler v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 152 N.W. 882 Minn. 1915
Co. 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 Am.
Russell v. O'Connor 139 N.W. 148 Minn. 1912
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 452 , , 70 Am.
Tegels v. Great Northern Railway Co. 138 N.W. 945 Minn. 1912
Co. 71 Minn. 438, 452 , , 70 Am.
Great Northern Express Co. v. National Surety Co. 129 N.W. 127 Minn. 1911
Co., *167 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 Am.
Morris v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 117 N.W. 500 Minn. 1908
Co., 71 Minn. 438, 439 , , 70 Am.
Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 114 N.W. 1123 Minn. 1908
Co., 71 Minn. 438, 450 , , 70 Am.
O'Brien v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 108 N.W. 805 Minn. 1906
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , , 70 Am.
Continental Insurance v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 107 N.W. 548 Minn. 1906
Co., 71 Minn. 438, 449 , , 70 Am.
Teal v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 104 N.W. 945 Minn. 1905
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , ; Alger, Smith & Co. v. Duluth-Superior Traction Co., 93 Minn. 314 , .
Campbell v. Railway Transfer Co. 104 N.W. 547 Minn. 1905
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , ; Kaillen v. Northwestern B. Co., 46 Minn. 187 , .
Alger, Smith & Co. v. Duluth-Superior Traction Co. 101 N.W. 298 Minn. 1904
Co., 71 Minn. 450 , ; Sloniker v. Great Northern Ry.
Rawitzer v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 100 N.W. 664 Minn. 1904
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , ; Sloniker v. Great Northern Ry.
Russell v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 86 N.W. 346 Minn. 1901
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , ), and falls short of showing a failure to exercise reasonable and ordinary care to avoid the accident after discovering the peril plaintiff was in.
Lando v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 83 N.W. 1089 Minn. 1900
Co., 71 Minn. 488 , ; Sloniker v. Great Northern Ry.
Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 79 N.W. 1043 Minn. 1899
This case was before this court upon a former appeal, 71 Minn. 438 , , where the facts were quite fully examined, and the law applicable to the case stated, except such new questions as have arisen on the second trial and will be referred to further on in this opinion.
National German-American Bank v. Lawrence 79 N.W. 1016 Minn. 1899
Tyler v. Omeis 79 N.W. 528 Minn. 1899
Sloniker v. Great Northern Railway Co. 79 N.W. 168 Minn. 1899
Isackson v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 77 N.W. 433 Minn. 1898
Fulmore v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 75 N.W. 589 Minn. 1898
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , , and other cases relied on by the defendant.
McBride v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 75 N.W. 231 Minn. 1898
Co., 71 Minn. 438 , , and nothing need be added to what is there said.