Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burchard v. Hull, 74 N.W. 163.

28 citing documents.

Hockemeyer v. Pooler 130 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1964
Hockemeyer v. Pooler 130 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1964
The principles of the law of agency applicable in the instant case were aptly stated by Mr. Justice Mitchell in the case of Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430, 435 , , as follows: “It is axiomatic in the law of agency that no one can become the agent of another except by the will of the principal, either express or implied from the particular circumstances; that an agent cannot create in himself an authority to do a particular act merely by its performance
Nerlund v. Schiavone 84 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1957
Nerlund v. Schiavone 84 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1957
9 Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , .
Mooney v. Jones 54 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1952
Mooney v. Jones 54 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1952
In Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430, 435 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, this court said: “It is axiomatic in the law of agency that no one can become the agent of another except by the will of the principal, either express or implied from the particular circumstances; that an agent cannot create in himself an authority to d
Ziegler v. Denver Hog Serum Co. 283 N.W. 134 Minn. 1938
Ziegler v. Denver Hog Serum Co. 283 N.W. 134 Minn. 1938
Here, as in Dehnhoff v. Heinen, 202 Minn. 295, 299 , , 353: “The principle here involved can best be stated in the language of Mr. Justice Mitchell in Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430, 435 , , 164: ‘It is axiomatic in the law of agency that no one can become the agent of another except by the will of the principal, either express or implied from the particular circumstances; that an agent cannot create in himself an authority to do a particular act merely by its performance.
Dehnhoff v. Heinen 278 N.W. 351 Minn. 1938
Dehnhoff v. Heinen 278 N.W. 351 Minn. 1938
The principle here involved can best be stated in the language of Mr. Justice Mitchell in Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , 435 , 74 N.W.
Cauger v. Gray Motor Co. 217 N.W. 347 Minn. 1928
Cauger v. Gray Motor Co. 217 N.W. 347 Minn. 1928
Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , .
Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Insurance 181 N.W. 580 Minn. 1921
Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Insurance 181 N.W. 580 Minn. 1921
481; Watts v. Howard, 70 Minn. 122 , ; Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; Kilborn v. Prudential Ins.
Hedding v. Schauble 177 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1920
Hedding v. Schauble 177 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1920
P. R. Co. 57 Minn. 142 , ; Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; First Nat.
State v. Lawrence 153 N.W. 123 Minn. 1915
State v. Lawrence 153 N.W. 123 Minn. 1915
Trull v. Hammond, 71 Minn. 172 , ; Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; Rand v. Perkins, 74 Minn. 16 , ; Dwight v. Lenz, 75 Minn. 78 , ; Smith v. Fletcher, 75 Minn. 189 , ; Budd v. Broen, 75 Minn. 316 , ; Thomas v. Swanke, 75 Minn. 321 , ; Schenk v. Dexter, 77 Minn. 15 , ; White v. Madigan, 78 M
Springfield Savings Bank v. Kjaer 84 N.W. 752 Minn. 1901
Deering Harvester Co. v. Donovan 84 N.W. 745 Minn. 1901
Deering Harvester Co. v. Donovan 84 N.W. 745 Minn. 1901
Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; Dexter v. Morrow, 76 Minn. 413 , , and White v. Madigan, 78 Minn. 286 , , are not in point.
Springfield Savings Bank v. Kjaer 84 N.W. 752 Minn. 1901
Nor did such fact appear in the case of Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , , nor in White v. Madigan, 78 Minn. 286 , .
Jackson v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance 81 N.W. 545 Minn. 1900
Jackson v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance 81 N.W. 545 Minn. 1900
Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; Budd v. Broen, 75 Minn. 316 , ; Thomas v. Swanke, 75 Minn. 326 , .
White v. Madigan 80 N.W. 1125 Minn. 1899
White v. Madigan 80 N.W. 1125 Minn. 1899
Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , .
Dexter v. Morrow 79 N.W. 394 Minn. 1899
Dexter v. Morrow 79 N.W. 394 Minn. 1899
Burchard v. Hull, 71 Minn. 430 , ; Trull v. Hammond, 71 Minn. 172 , .