DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Svanburg v. Fosseen, 78 N.W. 4.

55 citing documents.

  • Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    But “[p]ayment of the price, although not of itself sufficient to admit of the equitable remedy, is always regarded as a strong circumstance in connection with other acts, such as possession or the making of improvements.”
  • Bouten v. Richard Miller Homes, Inc. 321 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1982
  • Bouten v. Richard Miller Homes, Inc. 321 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1982
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , 78 N.W.
  • Zuelch v. Droege 56 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1953
  • Zuelch v. Droege 56 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1953
    Jannetta v. Jannetta, supra; Morrow v. Porter, 161 Minn. 396 , ; Brasch v. Reeves, 124 Minn. 114 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427; Schmidt v. Barr, 333 Ill.
  • O'BRIEN v. Demeules 47 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1951
  • O'BRIEN v. Demeules 47 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1951
    Since the case of Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 490, this court has had frequent occasions to discuss the principles on which specific performance of oral land contracts may be decreed when the consideration is alleged personal services.
  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , [43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 490].
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    450 ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , 78 N.W.
  • Matheson v. Gullickson 24 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
  • Matheson v. Gullickson 24 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
    See, Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 490; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Albachten v. Bradley 3 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1942
  • Albachten v. Bradley 3 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1942
    Schaefer v. Thoeny, 199 Minn. 610 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 190; Brown v. Hoag, 35 Minn. 373 , .
  • Jannetta v. Jannetta 285 N.W. 619 Minn. 1939
  • Jannetta v. Jannetta 285 N.W. 619 Minn. 1939
    Laird v. Vila, 93 Minn. 45 , , 106 A. S. R. 420; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 13 L. R. A. 427, 71 A. S. R. 190.
  • Umbreit v. Carley 277 N.W. 549 Minn. 1938
  • In Re Estate of Roberts 277 N.W. 549 Minn. 1938
  • Umbreit v. Carley 277 N.W. 549 Minn. 1938
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 490; Ellis v. Cary, 74 Wis.
  • In Re Estate of Roberts 277 N.W. 549 Minn. 1938
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , 78 N.W.
  • Schaefer v. Thoeny 273 N.W. 190 Minn. 1937
  • Schaefer v. Thoeny 273 N.W. 190 Minn. 1937
    uation on the faith of an oral agreement within the statute, to such an extent that it would be a fraud on the part of the other party to set up its invalidity, equity will make the case an exception to the statute.’ That is, equity will not permit the statute, the purpose of which was to prevent fraud, to be used as a means of committing it.” The following cases are helpful: Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 A. S. R. 490; Jorgenson v. Jorgenson, 81 Minn. 428 , ; Janochos
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
    Laird v. Vila, 93 Minn. 45 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350, 363 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 Am.
  • Whitman v. Dittman 191 N.W. 821 Minn. 1923
  • Whitman v. Dittman 191 N.W. 821 Minn. 1923
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L. R. A. 427, 74 Am.
  • Jentzen v. Pruter 180 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1921
  • Jentzen v. Pruter 180 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1921
    538; Svanberg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Colby v. Street 178 N.W. 599 Minn. 1920
  • Colby v. Street 178 N.W. 599 Minn. 1920
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Wold v. Wold 165 N.W. 229 Minn. 1917
  • Wold v. Wold 165 N.W. 229 Minn. 1917
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Trebesch v. Trebesch 153 N.W. 754 Minn. 1915
  • Trebesch v. Trebesch 153 N.W. 754 Minn. 1915
    Slingerland v. Slingerland, 39 Minn. 197 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Hayes v. Hayes 148 N.W. 125 Minn. 1914
  • Hayes v. Hayes 148 N.W. 125 Minn. 1914
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Robertson v. Corcoran 145 N.W. 812 Minn. 1914
  • Robertson v. Corcoran 145 N.W. 812 Minn. 1914
    Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Brasch v. Reeves 144 N.W. 744 Minn. 1913
  • Brasch v. Reeves 144 N.W. 744 Minn. 1913
    The following cases illustrate the principles applicable: Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , ; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , ; Laird v. Vila, 93 Minn. 45 , ; Richardson v. Richardson, 114 Minn. 12 , ; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 118 Minn. 394 , .
  • Haubrich v. Haubrich 136 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
  • Haubrich v. Haubrich 136 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
    Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Richardson v. Richardson 130 N.W. 4 Minn. 1911
  • Richardson v. Richardson 130 N.W. 4 Minn. 1911
    *15 Plaintiff refers ns to Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.
  • Laird v. Vila 100 N.W. 656 Minn. 1904
  • Laird v. Vila 100 N.W. 656 Minn. 1904
    On the other hand, it was expressly held in Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , and reaffirmed in Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , *49 , that the probate court is without, and the district court has, jurisdiction over actions for the specific performance of parol contracts for the conveyance of real and personal property.
  • Stellmacher v. Bruder 95 N.W. 324 Minn. 1903