Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carver v. Bagley, 81 N.W. 757.

54 citing documents.

Perham Hospital District, Minn. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment Minn. 2021
Don Kral Incorporated v. Lindstrom 173 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1970
Don Kral Incorporated v. Lindstrom 173 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1970
(3 ed.) § 414, and cases cited under notes 9 to 14; Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; State, by Peterson, v. Bentley, 245 Minn. 334 , 71 N. W. (2d) 780 .
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
e court, of course, fully and fairly to consider such evidence, but so far only as is necessary to determine beyond question that it reasonably tends to support the findings; not that the trial court would not have been justified in making findings thereon in appellant’s favor, but that the findings made are supported by evidence reasonably tending to establish the facts found.” Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114, 115 , .
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
rt, of course, fully and *210 fairly to consider such evidence, but so far only as is necessary to determine beyond question that it reasonably tends to support the findings; not that the trial court would not have been justified in making findings thereon in appellant’s favor, but that the findings made are supported by evidence reasonably tending to establish the facts found.” Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114, 115 , ; Service & Security, Inc. v. St.
Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .” Important, also, in this case is what we there said ( 211 Minn. 203 , ) : “It is not our province to go into an extended discussion of the evidence to prove or demonstrate the absolute correctness of the findings of the trial court.
Service & Security, Inc. v. St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 300 N.W. 811 Minn. 1941
Service & Security, Inc. v. St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 300 N.W. 811 Minn. 1941
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 201 N.W. 606 Minn. 1924
Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 201 N.W. 606 Minn. 1924
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; Weiss v. Great Northern Ry.
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co. 191 N.W. 47 Minn. 1922
Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co. 191 N.W. 47 Minn. 1922
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; Weiss v. Great Northern Ry.
Wilson v. Wilson 186 N.W. 126 Minn. 1921
Wilson v. Wilson 186 N.W. 126 Minn. 1921
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; Barnum v. Jefferson, 109 Minn. 1 , .
Minneapolis Holding Co. v. Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. 169 N.W. 534 Minn. 1918
Minneapolis Holding Co. v. Landers-Morrison-Christenson Co. 169 N.W. 534 Minn. 1918
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Woodville v. Morrill 153 N.W. 131 Minn. 1915
Woodville v. Morrill 153 N.W. 131 Minn. 1915
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; Johnson-Van Sant Co. v. Martens, 113 Minn. 486 , ; Wunder v. Turner, 120 Minn. 13 , ; Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co. 126 Minn. 417 , .
Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co. 148 N.W. 566 Minn. 1914
Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co. 148 N.W. 566 Minn. 1914
Justice Start in Wunder v. Turner, 120 Minn. 13, 16 , , referring to the voluminous testimony there brought up for consideration, its bulk “makes this case a proper one for the application of the rule that it is not the duty of an appellate court to demonstrate, by a review of the evidence, the correctness of the findings of fact by the trial court.” See also Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
Treat v. Kellogg, 104 Minn. 54 , ; Barnum v. Jefferson, 109 Minn. 1 , ; Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Wunder v. Turner 138 N.W. 770 Minn. 1912
Wunder v. Turner 138 N.W. 770 Minn. 1912
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
McKinnon v. Red River Lumber Co. 138 N.W. 781 Minn. 1912
McKinnon v. Red River Lumber Co. 138 N.W. 781 Minn. 1912
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , , was decided after the law was amended so as to give a lien to one who performs “manual labor or other service for hire,” and is important in this connection only as it again announces the rule that the statute is a remedial one- and should be given a broad and liberal construction.
Johnson-Van Sant Co. v. Martens 129 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
Johnson-Van Sant Co. v. Martens 129 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Demaris v. Rodgers 124 N.W. 457 Minn. 1910
Demaris v. Rodgers 124 N.W. 457 Minn. 1910
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114
Barnum v. Jefferson 122 N.W. 453 Minn. 1909
Barnum v. Jefferson 122 N.W. 453 Minn. 1909
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Christians v. Christians 121 N.W. 633 Minn. 1909
Christians v. Christians 121 N.W. 633 Minn. 1909
It was said, in a recent case, whether the appellant “sustained this burden was a question of fact to be determined by the trial judge, and his finding thereon is conclusive on appeal, if there is any evidence reasonably tending to support it.” Lloyd v. Simons, 97 Minn. 315, 321 , ; State v. Union Tank Line Co., 94 Minn. 320, 325 , ; Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , ; Prahl v. County of Brown, 104 Minn. 227, 228 , .
Powers v. Johnson 120 N.W. 1021 Minn. 1909
Powers v. Johnson 120 N.W. 1021 Minn. 1909
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Prahl v. County of Brown 116 N.W. 483 Minn. 1908
Prahl v. County of Brown 116 N.W. 483 Minn. 1908
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Cook v. Koochiching Co. 109 N.W. 1120 Minn. 1906
Cook v. Koochiching Co. 109 N.W. 1120 Minn. 1906
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
Lloyd v. Simons 105 N.W. 902 Minn. 1906
Lloyd v. Simons 105 N.W. 902 Minn. 1906
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .
State v. Union Tank Line Co. 102 N.W. 721 Minn. 1905
State v. Union Tank Line Co. 102 N.W. 721 Minn. 1905
Carver v. Bagley, 79 Minn. 114 , .