Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 81 N.W. 1057.

35 citing documents.

Gelin v. Hollister 24 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1946
Gelin v. Hollister 24 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1946
In Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , 231 , 81 N.W.
Holmes v. Conter 295 N.W. 649 Minn. 1941
Holmes v. Conter 295 N.W. 649 Minn. 1941
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Kelly v. McKeown, 151 Minn. 525 , .
Johnson v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. 266 N.W. 169 Minn. 1936
Johnson v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. 266 N.W. 169 Minn. 1936
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Alexander v. Hutchins, 158 Minn. 391 , .
In Re Estate of Simon 245 N.W. 31 Minn. 1932
In Re Estate of Simon 245 N.W. 31 Minn. 1932
Barrett v. Smith 237 N.W. 15 Minn. 1931
Barrett v. Smith 237 N.W. 15 Minn. 1931
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Gasser v. Spalding, 164 Minn. 443 , .
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls 232 N.W. 322 Minn. 1930
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls 232 N.W. 322 Minn. 1930
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Tomlinson v. Phelps, 93 Minn. 350 , ; Connelly v. Carnegie D. & F. Co. 148 Minn. 333 , ; In re Judicial *332 Ditch No. 4, 160 Minn. 387 , .
Vazquez v. Dreyfus 269 P. 80 Ariz. 1928
Paul v. Paul 238 P. 399 Ariz. 1925
First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 203 N.W. 612 Minn. 1925
F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Gua. 203 N.W. 612 Minn. 1925
First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 203 N.W. 612 Minn. 1925
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Tomlinson v. Phelps, 93 Minn. 350 , .
F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Gua. 203 N.W. 612 Minn. 1925
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , 81 N.W.
Huseby v. Schacherer 200 N.W. 471 Minn. 1924
Huseby v. Schacherer 200 N.W. 471 Minn. 1924
Also see Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Connelly v. Carnegie Dock and Fuel Co. 148 Minn. 333 , .
Alexander v. Hutchins 197 N.W. 754 Minn. 1924
Alexander v. Hutchins 197 N.W. 754 Minn. 1924
Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , , and Kelly v. McKeown, 151 Minn. 525 , , were cited in support of this contention.
Leeker v. Leeker 202 P. 397 Ariz. 1921
Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 857 Minn. 1921
Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 857 Minn. 1921
This subject is discussed at length in Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , .
Wold v. Wold 165 N.W. 229 Minn. 1917
Wold v. Wold 165 N.W. 229 Minn. 1917
Paul, 83 Minn. 401 , ; Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , .
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Silver 164 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1917
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Silver 164 N.W. 1015 Minn. 1917
Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , .
Savela v. Erickson 163 N.W. 1029 Minn. 1917
Savela v. Erickson 163 N.W. 1029 Minn. 1917
In Tomlinson v. Phelps it was said the limit of power of the court to vacate its decrees is the same as in district court, and this is the statute (G. S. 1913, § 7211), and following the decision in Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , , it was held that where the application rested upon considerations of legal right wholly, it must, under well settled rules of law, be made before the time for appeal expired, and that the statutes giving the court power to modify its judgments “for g
Pulver v. Commercial Security Co. 160 N.W. 781 Minn. 1917
Pulver v. Commercial Security Co. 160 N.W. 781 Minn. 1917
Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , ; Tomlinson v. Phelps, 93 Minn. 350 , .
Tomlinson v. Phelps 101 N.W. 496 Minn. 1904
Tomlinson v. Phelps 101 N.W. 496 Minn. 1904
The powers of the district court are limited by section 5267, G. S. 1894, as construed in Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank, 79 Minn. 226 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by