11,964—(118)
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
Neissen v. City of St. Paul
The holding in the court’s own words
We hold, following Nicol v. City of St. Paul, infra, that they were.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- McGandy v. City of Marshall 227 N.W. 177 Minn. 1929
- Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 178 N.W. 605 Minn. 1920
- Riley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 85 N.W. 947 Minn. 1901
Opinion text
PEE CUEIAM. This was a personal injury action, and the defendant appealed from an order overruling its demurrer to the complaint. The record presents the question whether the provisions of the charter of the city of St. Paul as to giving notice of personal injuries were repealed by Laws 1897, c. 248, covering the same subject. We hold, following Nicol v. City of St. Paul, infra, that they were. Order affirmed.