Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Anderson v. Sullivan, 75 N.W. 8.

45 citing documents.

Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
Associated Builders, d at 307 (quoting Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , 75 N.W.
Unity Church of St. Paul v. State 694 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Unity Church of St. Paul v. State 694 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(quoting Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 133 , 75 N.W.
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
In Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 130-31 , 75 N.W.
Williams v. Rolfe 114 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1962
Williams v. Rolfe 114 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1962
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , , involved the constitutionality of L. 1895, c. 301, by the terms of which all counties having a population of not less than 100,000 and not over 185,000 were affected.
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
Minneapolis Gas Co. v. Zimmerman 91 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1958
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , .
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Foster v. Naftalin 74 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1956
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 132 , , 9: * * The subject of classification* by population is so largely a matter of policy, and the considerations which enter into it are so numerous and complex, that the legislature must necessarily be allowed a large discretion in the matter; and the courts ought not to hold a statute invalid or spec
State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65 54 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1952
State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65 54 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1952
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 133 , , 9: * * The familiar rule on the subject is that, although a part of the statute is unconstitutional, that fact does not authorize the courts to declare the remainder void also, unless all the provisions are connected in subject-matter, depending on each other, operating together for the same purpos
State Ex Rel. Finnegan v. Burt 29 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Finnegan v. Burt 29 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1947
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State ex rel.
Leighton v. City of Minneapolis 25 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1946
Leighton v. City of Minneapolis 25 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1946
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 132 , .
Giffin, Sr. v. Village of Hibbing 227 N.W. 41 Minn. 1929
Giffin, Sr. v. Village of Hibbing 227 N.W. 41 Minn. 1929
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State ex rel.
Lodoen v. City of Warren 178 N.W. 741 Minn. 1920
Lodoen v. City of Warren 178 N.W. 741 Minn. 1920
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State v. Standard Oil Co. 111 Minn. 85 , ; State v. Ryder, 126 Minn. 95 , Saari v. Gleason, 126 Minn. 378 , ; Bofferding v. Mengelkoch, 129 Minn. 184 , .
State ex rel. Flaten v. Independent School District 174 N.W. 414 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Flaten v. Independent School District 174 N.W. 414 Minn. 1919
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; Marwin v. Board of Auditorium Commrs.
Marwin v. Board of Auditorium Commissioners 168 N.W. 17 Minn. 1918
Marwin v. Board of Auditorium Commissioners 168 N.W. 17 Minn. 1918
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , .
Saari v. Gleason 148 N.W. 293 Minn. 1914
Saari v. Gleason 148 N.W. 293 Minn. 1914
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126, 133 , ; State v. Duluth Gas & Water Co. 76 Minn. 96 , , 57 L.R.A.
Gard v. County of Otter Tail 144 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
Gard v. County of Otter Tail 144 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 59 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
In State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , , it was held that population was a proper basis for the classification of counties for the purpose of fixing the compensation of county and city officials.
State ex rel. Roche v. Rogers 106 N.W. 345 Minn. 1906
State ex rel. Roche v. Rogers 106 N.W. 345 Minn. 1906
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , .
State ex rel. Douglas v. Westfall 89 N.W. 175 Minn. 1902
State ex rel. Douglas v. Westfall 89 N.W. 175 Minn. 1902
Louis Co., 61 Minn. 542 , ; State v. Sullivan, 72 *439 Minn. 126 , ; State v. Ritt, 76 Minn. 531 , ; Murray v. Board of Co. Commrs.
State ex rel. Douglas v. Ritt 79 N.W. 535 Minn. 1899
State ex rel. Douglas v. Ritt 79 N.W. 535 Minn. 1899
For example, a classification of counties or cities on the ^asis of population might be proper, as was held in State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , , for the purpose of fixing the compensation of county or city officers, inasmuch as the extent of their duties and labors presumably will bear some relation to the population of their respective counties and cities, while classification on any such basis for the purpose of fixing the time at which electi
State ex rel. Bazille v. Sullivan 76 N.W. 223 Minn. 1898
State ex rel. Wagener v. Sullivan 76 N.W. 224 Minn. 1898
State ex rel. Wagener v. Sullivan 76 N.W. 224 Minn. 1898
Anderson v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; and very recently in State ex rel.
State ex rel. Bazille v. Sullivan 76 N.W. 223 Minn. 1898
The right of the relator to the *381 salary warrant ordered to be issued by the court below turns upon the validity of the legislative acts of 1891 and 1895, and his counsel contends that as to him both acts are unconstitutional and void, within the decisions in Simard v. Sullivan, 71 Minn. 517 , , and State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , , in which it was held that the provisions of the act of 1895, relating to county officers whose compensation was authorized to be increased, are invalid, because