DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kayser v. Lindell, 75 N.W. 1038.

25 citing documents.

  • Sperr Ex Rel. Sperr v. Ramsey County 429 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Sperr Ex Rel. Sperr v. Ramsey County 429 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    “While the owner of premises may owe more duty to a child than to an adult coming upon his premises * * *, yet he is not bound to guard every stairway, cellar-way, retaining wall, shed, tree and open window on his premises * * Kayser v. Undell, 73 Minn. 123, 126 , 75 N.W.
  • Robles v. Severyn 504 P.2d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
  • Hocking v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1962
  • Hocking v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1962
    The *492 rule was stated by this court in Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , , where the 3 Vi-year-old child of a tenant fell off a retaining wall in the rear of the yard maintained by the landlord for the common use of tenants.
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
    ial court that “To require one to use that care which an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under the same *507 or similar circumstances can hardly be onerous, unreasonable or oppressive.” The following Minnesota authorities may be referred to in support of defendants’ position: Harpel v. Fall, 63 Minn. 520 , ; Tvedt v. Wheeler, 70 Minn. 161 , ; Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , ; Farley v. Byers, 106 Minn. 260 , ; Ames v. Brandvold, 119 Minn. 521 , ; Daley v. Towne, 127 Minn. 231 , ; Keeg
  • Slinker v. Wallner 103 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1960
  • Slinker v. Wallner 103 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1960
    there any evidence of notice to the owner that children ever went on the roof of the building.” In Meagher v. Hirt, 232 Minn. 336, 340 , 45 N. W. (2d) 563, 565 , we said: “* * * jje [the defendant] can only be held liable for negligence if there was a foreseeable risk of injury to children * * In Ewing v. George Benz & Sons, supra, we quoted with approval the following from Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123, 126 , , 1039: “* * * While the owner of premises may owe more duty to a child than to
  • Ewing Ex Rel. Ewing v. George Benz & Sons 28 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1947
  • Ewing Ex Rel. Ewing v. George Benz & Sons 28 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1947
    Bather, it ap-j *515 pears to come within the scope of Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , .
  • Merrill v. Morris Court, Inc. 231 N.W. 231 Minn. 1930
  • Merrill v. Morris Court, Inc. 231 N.W. 231 Minn. 1930
    Johnson v. Ramberg, 49 Minn. 341 , ; Ryder v. Kinsey, 62 Minn. 85 , , 34 L. R. A. 557, 54 A. S. R. 623; Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , ; Corrigan v. Elsinger, 81 Minn. 42 , ; Strunk v. Wells Brothers Co. 120 Minn. 77 , ; Mazey v. Loveland, 133 Minn. 210 , , L. R. A. 1916F, 279; O’Keefe v. Dietz, 142 Minn. 445 , .
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
    Harpel v. Fall, 63 Minn. 520 , ; Tvedt v. Wheeler, 70 Minn. 161 , ; Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , ; Barron v. Liedloff, 95 Minn. 474 , ; Farley v. Byers, 106 Minn. 260 , , 130 A. S. R. 613; Ames v. Brandvold, 119 Minn. 521 , ; Daley v. Towne, 127 Minn. 231 , ; Keegan vG.
  • Mix v. Downing 222 N.W. 913 Minn. 1929
    1062 ; Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , 75 N.W.
  • Erickson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 205 N.W. 889 Minn. 1925
  • Erickson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 205 N.W. 889 Minn. 1925
    In Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , , it was held that this doctrine did not apply to a case where a 31,-year old child climbed upon a retaining wall and was injured by falling therefrom.
  • Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co. 145 N.W. 796 Minn. 1914
  • Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co. 145 N.W. 796 Minn. 1914
    597 ; Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , ; Erickson v. Great Northern Ry.
  • Ames v. Brandvold 138 N.W. 786 Minn. 1912
  • Ames v. Brandvold 138 N.W. 786 Minn. 1912
    Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , ; 24 Cyc.
  • Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 84 N.W. 462 Minn. 1900
  • Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co. 84 N.W. 462 Minn. 1900
    Kayser v. Lindell, 73 Minn. 123 , .