Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Madigan v. Wagener, 77 N.W. 424.

30 citing documents.

Edward B. Berkner, Trustee of Berkner Living Trust, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State v. Lessley 779 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 2010
State v. Lessley 779 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 2010
Madigan v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518, 523 , 77 N.W.
Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Hostility is flexibly determined by examining “the character of the posses *111 sion and the acts of ownership of the occupant.” Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11 , Fredericksen, 167 Minn. at 359 , 209 N.W.
Pickar v. Erickson 382 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See also Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11
State v. Hoyt 304 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1981
(3) The Bona Fide Claim of Right The state cites Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , for the proposition that the phrase “claim of right” in Minn.Stat.
Gaulke v. State 184 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1971
Gaulke v. State 184 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1971
Madigan v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518, 523 , ; and City of St.
Thomas v. Mrkonich 78 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
The rule governing hostile intent is set forth in Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11 , , as follows: “To make a disseisin it is not necessary that the disseisor should enter under color of title, or should either believe or assert that he had a right to enter.
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
Madigan v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518 , , 42 L. R. A. 749, 73 A. S. R. 369; State v. Luscher, 157 Minn. 192 , ; State v. Broden, 181 Minn. 341 , .
Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
*315 In fact, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Mitchell in Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , , of the five essentials necessary to the creation of title by adverse possession, the one that the possession must be hostile need not be under any claim of right.
Village of Newport v. Taylor 30 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1948
See, Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , ; 4 Tiffany, Real Property (3 ed.) § 1147.
Schmidt v. Marschel 2 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1942
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
Madigan v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518 , , 42 L. R. A. 749, 73 A. S. R. 369; State v. Luscher, 157 Minn. 192 , ; State v. Broden, 181 Minn. 341 , .
Naporra v. Weckwerth 226 N.W. 569 Minn. 1929
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , ; Stevens v. Velde, 138 Minn. 59 , ; Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356 , , 46 A. L. R. 785; Guaranty T. & T. Corp. v. U. S. 264 U. S. 200 , 44 S. Ct. 252 , 68 L. ed. 636.
State Ex Rel. Klingle v. Fisher 218 N.W. 542 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Klingle v. Fisher 218 N.W. 542 Minn. 1928
Madigan v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518 , , 42 L. R. A. 749, 73 A. S. R. 369; In re Grimley, 137 U. S. 147 , 11 S. Ct. 54 , 34 L. ed. 636.
Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Guaranty T. & T. Corp. v. U. S. 264 U. S. 200 , 44 Sup.
Sullivan v. Altman 229 P. 388 Ariz. 1924
Stevens v. Velde 163 N.W. 796 Minn. 1917
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Mattson v. Warner, 115 Minn. 520 , ; Rupley v. Fraser, 132 Minn. 311 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , .
Cain v. Highland Co. 159 N.W. 830 Minn. 1916
N. W. 1127; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Mattson v. Warner, 115 Minn. 520 , .
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
305; State v. Wagener, 74 Minn. 518 , , 42 L.R.A.
Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Carpenter *298 v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 104 , .
Cool v. Kelly 80 N.W. 861 Minn. 1899
Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .