Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 77 N.W. 34.
-
Larry Walters, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“But the distinction must be kept in mind between the contract itself, which is within the purview of the statute, and the subsequent performance, which is not.”
- Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 228, 77 N.W.
- Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc.
780 N.W.2d 396
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Callender, 289 Minn. at 533 , d at 812 ; Rooney , 310 Minn, at 266-67, d at 175 -76 (citing Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 228 , 77 N.W.
- In Re the Estate of Giguere 366 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
In Re the Estate of Giguere
366 N.W.2d 345
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(quoting Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 228 , 77 N.W.
- Thoe v. Rasmussen 322 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1982
-
Thoe v. Rasmussen
322 N.W.2d 775
Minn. 1982
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 228 , 77 N.W.
- Greer v. Kooiker 253 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1977
-
Greer v. Kooiker
253 N.W.2d 133
Minn. 1977
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224
- Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 246 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1976
-
Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.
246 N.W.2d 170
Minn. 1976
In Scheer-schmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , we recognized that a contract subject to the statute of frauds could not be modified orally.
- Gunderson v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 78 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1956
-
Gunderson v. North American Life & Casualty Co.
78 N.W.2d 328
Minn. 1956
Co. 147 Minn. 161 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 229 , .
- Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. Nesbitt 237 N.W. 586 Minn. 1931
-
Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. Nesbitt
237 N.W. 586
Minn. 1931
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; McDonald v. Union Hay Co. 143 Minn. 40 , 172 U. W. 891; Reinkey v. Findley Elec.
- McCarron v. Commercial Credit Trust 209 N.W. 15 Minn. 1926
-
McCarron v. Commercial Credit Trust
209 N.W. 15
Minn. 1926
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Reinkey v. Findley Elec.
- Morton v. Griggs, Cooper & Co. 203 N.W. 218 Minn. 1925
-
Morton v. Griggs, Cooper & Co.
203 N.W. 218
Minn. 1925
Quinn v. Olson, 34 Minn. 422 , ; Mo v. Bettner, 68 Minn. 179 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Tingue v. Patch, 93 Minn. 437 , ; Lynch v. Higgins, 154 Minn. 151 , ; Trainer v. Lammers, 161 Minn. 336 , .
- Lynch v. Higgins 191 N.W. 422 Minn. 1923
-
Lynch v. Higgins
191 N.W. 422
Minn. 1923
Malmquist v. Peterson, 149 Minn. 223 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Quinn v. Olson, 34 Minn. 422 , .
- Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co. 180 N.W. 236 Minn. 1920
-
Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co.
180 N.W. 236
Minn. 1920
The principle is announced in Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , .
- McDonald v. Union Hay Co. 172 N.W. 891 Minn. 1919
-
McDonald v. Union Hay Co.
172 N.W. 891
Minn. 1919
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, .
- White v. Erickson 169 N.W. 535 Minn. 1918
-
White v. Erickson
169 N.W. 535
Minn. 1918
80 ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Alger-Fowler Co. v. Tracy, 98 Minn. 432 , .
- Nostdal v. Morehart 157 N.W. 584 Minn. 1916
-
Nostdal v. Morehart
157 N.W. 584
Minn. 1916
Fleckten v. Spicer, 63 Minn. 454 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Vallentyne v. Immigration Land Co. 95 Minn. 195 , , 5 Ann. Cas.
- Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
-
Nelson v. Gjestrum
136 N.W. 858
Minn. 1912
And further it is said that this court, by the decisions in Fleckten v. Spicer, 63 Minn. 454 , ; Brown v. Doyle, 69 Minn. 543 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Howe v. Coates, 90 Minn. 508 , , and Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , has receded from the rule first established by the decision of Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
- McKinley v. Macbeth 129 N.W. 216 Minn. 1911
-
McKinley v. Macbeth
129 N.W. 216
Minn. 1911
Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , .