DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carpenter v. Coles, 77 N.W. 424.

32 citing documents.

  • Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Hostility is flexibly determined by examining “the character of the posses *111 sion and the acts of ownership of the occupant.” Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11 , 77 N.W.
  • Pickar v. Erickson 382 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Pickar v. Erickson 382 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See also Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11 , 77 N.W.
  • State v. Hoyt 304 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Hoyt 304 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1981
    (3) The Bona Fide Claim of Right The state cites Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , 77 N.W.
  • Thomas v. Mrkonich 78 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
  • Thomas v. Mrkonich 78 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
    The rule governing hostile intent is set forth in Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9, 11 , , as follows: “To make a disseisin it is not necessary that the disseisor should enter under color of title, or should either believe or assert that he had a right to enter.
  • Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
  • Bjerketvedt v. Jacobson 44 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1950
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
  • Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
  • Alstad v. Boyer 37 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1949
    *315 In fact, as pointed out by Mr. Justice Mitchell in Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , , of the five essentials necessary to the creation of title by adverse possession, the one that the possession must be hostile need not be under any claim of right.
  • Village of Newport v. Taylor 30 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1948
  • Village of Newport v. Taylor 30 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1948
    See, Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , ; 4 Tiffany, Real Property (3 ed.) § 1147.
  • Schmidt v. Marschel 2 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1942
  • Schmidt v. Marschel 2 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1942
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
  • Naporra v. Weckwerth 226 N.W. 569 Minn. 1929
  • Naporra v. Weckwerth 226 N.W. 569 Minn. 1929
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , ; Stevens v. Velde, 138 Minn. 59 , ; Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356 , , 46 A. L. R. 785; Guaranty T. & T. Corp. v. U. S. 264 U. S. 200 , 44 S. Ct. 252 , 68 L. ed. 636.
  • Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
  • Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Guaranty T. & T. Corp. v. U. S. 264 U. S. 200 , 44 Sup.
  • Stevens v. Velde 163 N.W. 796 Minn. 1917
  • Stevens v. Velde 163 N.W. 796 Minn. 1917
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Mattson v. Warner, 115 Minn. 520 , ; Rupley v. Fraser, 132 Minn. 311 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , .
  • Cain v. Highland Co. 159 N.W. 830 Minn. 1916
  • Cain v. Highland Co. 159 N.W. 830 Minn. 1916
    N. W. 1127; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
  • Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
  • Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 102 , ; Mattson v. Warner, 115 Minn. 520 , .
  • Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
  • Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .
  • Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
  • Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
    Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Carpenter *298 v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , ; Cool v. Kelly, 78 Minn. 104 , .
  • Cool v. Kelly 80 N.W. 861 Minn. 1899
  • Cool v. Kelly 80 N.W. 861 Minn. 1899
    Carpenter v. Coles, 75 Minn. 9 , .