Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 77 N.W. 958.
-
Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
83 N.W. 511
Minn. 1900
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , ; Marquardt v. Hubner, 77 Minn. 442 , ; Kreatz v. St.
- Martin v. Walter Courtney 83 N.W. 503 Minn. 1900
-
Martin v. Walter Courtney
83 N.W. 503
Minn. 1900
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , , the motion should not be granted.
- Baxter v. Covenant Mutual Life Ass'n 83 N.W. 459 Minn. 1900
- Baxter v. Covenant Mutual Life Ass'n 83 N.W. 459 Minn. 1900
- Brennan Lumber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 83 N.W. 137 Minn. 1900
-
Brennan Lumber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.
83 N.W. 137
Minn. 1900
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , , it was held that this “Motion should only be granted when it clearly appears from the evidence that the cause of action or defense sought to be established could not, in point of substance, constitute a legal cause of action or a legal defense; and that it should be denied where it appears probable th
- Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake 82 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1900
-
Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake
82 N.W. 1097
Minn. 1900
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , , must be applied.
- Kreatz v. St. Cloud School District 81 N.W. 533 Minn. 1900
-
Kreatz v. St. Cloud School District
81 N.W. 533
Minn. 1900
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , , followed in Marquardt v. Hubner, 77 Minn. 442 , , judgment notwithstanding the verdict should only be granted when it is clear that the cause of action or defense put upon the record did not, in point of substance, constitute a legal ■ cause of action or defense.
- McKibbin v. Great Northern Railway Co. 80 N.W. 1052 Minn. 1899
-
McKibbin v. Great Northern Railway Co.
80 N.W. 1052
Minn. 1899
Co., 75 Minn. 266 , 77 N. W 958, this is not a case where judgment should be ordered for the defendant, but one which should be remanded for a new trial.
- Marquardt v. Hubner 80 N.W. 617 Minn. 1899
- Marquardt v. Hubner 80 N.W. 617 Minn. 1899