DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 78 N.W. 868.

38 citing documents.

  • Kelly v. City of Rochester 231 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1975
  • Kelly v. City of Rochester 231 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1975
    3 Three cases considering precedessor notice statutes illustrate this point: Doyle v. City of Duluth, 74 Minn. 157 , Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , Roberts v. Village of St.
  • Seifert v. City of Minneapolis 213 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1973
  • Seifert v. City of Minneapolis 213 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1973
    3 Illustrative of this is *39 the trilogy of Doyle v. City of Duluth, 74 Minn. 157 , Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , Roberts v. Village of St.
  • Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company 197 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1972
  • Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company 197 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1972
    By timely service of notice, the municipality is also afforded protection against stale or fraudulent claims or the connivance of corrupt employees or officials.” In Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20, 22 , in its initial examination of the statute’s requirements as to description of the place of the accident, the court said: “The notice is sufficient, for it identifies the place of the accident with substantial certainty.” (Italics supplied.)
  • McGuire v. Hennessy 193 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1971
  • McGuire v. Hennessy 193 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1971
    4 Doyle v. City of Duluth, 74 Minn. 157, 161 , Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20, 22 , Aronson v. City of St.
  • Grams v. Independent School District No. 742 176 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1970
  • Grams v. Independent School District No. 742 176 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1970
    James, 76 Minn. 456, 457 , , 520: “* * * In the cases of Doyle v. City of Duluth, 74 Minn. 157 , , and Lyons v. City of Red Wing, supra, [ 76 Minn. 20 , ] page 20, we indicated * * * [t]he method suggested for serving the notice * * * was to direct the notice to the council, and leave it with the clerk or other officer who had charge of the records and files * * *, with a request annexed that it be laid before the council at its next meeting; but the co
  • Behrendt v. Ahlstrand 118 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1962
  • Behrendt v. Ahlstrand 118 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1962
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; McKenzie v. City of Northfield, 30 Minn. 456 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Williams v. Minneapolis St.
  • Russell v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1961
  • Russell v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1961
    Paul, 116 Minn. 249 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Brittain v. City of Minneapolis, supra.
  • Brittain v. City of Minneapolis 84 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1957
  • Brittain v. City of Minneapolis 84 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1957
    Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; O’Brien v. City of St.
  • Larson v. City of Mankato 59 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1953
  • Larson v. City of Mankato 59 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1953
    Paul, 116 Minn. 249 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Harder v. City of Minneapolis, 40 Minn. 446 , .
  • Louko v. Village of Hibbing 25 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1946
  • Louko v. Village of Hibbing 25 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1946
    1913A, 668: “* * * Its purpose [that of the notice] is served if it directs the proper authorities to the place of the accident,, so that they may intelligently investigate and pass on any claims arising therefrom, and, if necessary, prepare for the defense in a suit.” See, also, Harder v. City of Minneapolis, 40 Minn. 446 , ; Lyons v. City of Bed Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
  • Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. *139 20, ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Murphy v. City of South St.
  • Aronson v. City of St. Paul 257 N.W. 662 Minn. 1934
  • Aronson v. City of St. Paul 257 N.W. 662 Minn. 1934
    That case and the case of Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20, 22 , , suggested the manner in which proper and orderly service may be made upon the city council'.
  • Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
  • Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; McKenzie v. City of Northfield, 30 Minn. 456 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Williams v. Minneapolis St.
  • State Ex Rel. Putnam v. Holm 215 N.W. 200 Minn. 1927
  • State Ex Rel. Putnam v. Holm 215 N.W. 200 Minn. 1927
    Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • Kief v. Mills 179 N.W. 724 Minn. 1920
  • Kief v. Mills 179 N.W. 724 Minn. 1920
    Matthews v. Torinus, 22 Minn. 132 ; Erickson v. Fisher, 51 Minn. 300 , Bassett v. Haren, 61 Minn. 346 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • Kandelin v. City of Ely 124 N.W. 449 Minn. 1910
  • Kandelin v. City of Ely 124 N.W. 449 Minn. 1910
    The place of the accident was sufficiently indicated: Harder v. City of Minne *59 apolis, 40 Minn. 446 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • MURPHY v. CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL 112 N.W. 259 Minn. 1907
  • MURPHY v. CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL 112 N.W. 259 Minn. 1907
    Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • Thomas v. Murphy 91 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1902
  • Thomas v. Murphy 91 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1902
    Bassett v. Haren, 61 Minn. 346 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , .
  • Taylor v. City of Mankato 83 N.W. 1084 Minn. 1900
  • Taylor v. City of Mankato 83 N.W. 1084 Minn. 1900
    Paul, 22 Minn. 443 , and ending with Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , , that previous knowledge that a public way is out of .