Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zeno, 81 N.W. 748.

28 citing documents.

In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
L. Rev. 487, 489 (1965); see, e.g., State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80, 83-85, 81 N.W.
In Re Block 727 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Block 727 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80, 84 , 81 N.W.
Minnesota Board of Barber Examiners v. Laurance 218 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1974
Minnesota Board of Barber Examiners v. Laurance 218 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1974
*207 See, State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80, 84 , Luzier S. F. Laboratories v. State Bd.
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L. R. A. 88.
State v. Sullivan 71 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1955
State v. Sullivan 71 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1955
3 See, State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L. R. A. 88, 79 A. S. R. 422; Luzier S. F. Laboratories v. State Board, 189 Minn. 151 , ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 ; Johnson v. Ervin, 205 Minn. 84 , ; United Enterprises, Inc. v. Dubey (N. D. Fla.)
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
124 (plumbers); State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , 81 N.W.
Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
In State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80, 84 , , wherein a statute regulating the trade of barbering was held constitutional as being within the police power of the state, this court said: “* * * The public is interested in his competency and qualifications, and it is eminently proper that there be thrown around the calling protection from
State Ex Rel. Krausmann v. Streeter 33 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1948
State Ex Rel. Krausmann v. Streeter 33 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1948
State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , 81 N.W.
Johnson v. Ervin 285 N.W. 77 Minn. 1939
Johnson v. Ervin 285 N.W. 77 Minn. 1939
State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , 81 * L. R. A. 88, 79 A. S. R. 422; Luzier Special Formula Laboratories v. State Board, 189 Minn. 151 , .
Luzier Special Formula Laboratories v. State Board of Hairdressing & Beauty Culture Examiners 248 N.W. 664 Minn. 1933
Luzier Special Formula Laboratories v. State Board of Hairdressing & Beauty Culture Examiners 248 N.W. 664 Minn. 1933
The reasons are sufficiently stated in State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L. R. A. 88, 79 A. S. R. 422, in sustaining the barber law against the same constitutional objections made here.
State v. De Guile 199 N.W. 569 Minn. 1924
State v. De Guile 199 N.W. 569 Minn. 1924
That act was sustained in State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L. R. A. 88, 79 Am.
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
464; State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L. R. A. 88, 79 Am.
State v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. 126 N.W. 126 Minn. 1910
State v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. 126 N.W. 126 Minn. 1910
575; State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , , 48 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Chapel v. Justus 97 N.W. 124 Minn. 1903
State ex rel. Chapel v. Justus 97 N.W. 124 Minn. 1903
The subject-matter of the act, viz., the regulation and control of the business of plumbing, is properly a subject of police regulation, within principles discussed and applied in State v. Zeno, 79 Minn. 80 , .