Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. City of St. Cloud, 81 N.W. 746.

18 citing documents.

Becker County National Bank v. Davis 284 N.W. 789 Minn. 1939
See O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426.
Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
Cloud, 79 Minn. 88 , ; Downs v. St.
Tracey v. City of Minneapolis 241 N.W. 390 Minn. 1932
Gustafson v. Gustafson 226 N.W. 412 Minn. 1929
gainst the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand and its effect as an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.” In the latter case the judgment in the first suit does operate as an estoppel, but only as to any “point or question actually litigated and determined.” 15 R. C. L. 962, 973; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426; Kinzel v. B. & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Maguire v. Maguire, 171 Minn. 4
Reichert v. Pure Oil Co. 214 N.W. 669 Minn. 1927
O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 A. S. R. 426; Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Maguire v. Maguire, 171 Minn. 492 , , .
Wilson v. Erickson 188 N.W. 994 Minn. 1922
624; Hatch v. Coddington, 32 Minn. 92 , ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 149 N.W. 131 Minn. 1914
673; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Northern Trust Co. v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Assn. 67 Minn. 131 , ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
See also O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
Tillinghast v. United States Saving & Loan Co. 108 N.W. 472 Minn. 1906
O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
H. W. Wilson Co. v. A. B. Farnham & Co. 106 N.W. 342 Minn. 1906
Thompson v. Myrick, 24 Minn. 4 ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
Grant v. City of Brainerd 90 N.W. 307 Minn. 1902
Grant v. City of Brainerd 90 N.W. 307 Minn. 1902
Cloud, 79 Minn. 88 , , where it was held to be a municipal duty to maintain the ordinary highways for travel by men and teams in populous portions of the city.
Friday v. City of Moorhead 87 N.W. 780 Minn. 1901
Friday v. City of Moorhead 87 N.W. 780 Minn. 1901
Cloud, 79 Minn. 88 , , are directly in point.
Blew v. Ritz 85 N.W. 548 Minn. 1901
O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , .
King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 82 N.W. 1113 Minn. 1900
Co., 39 Minn. 451 , ; Thompson v. Myrick, 24 Minn. 4 ; Ziebarth v. Nye, 42 Minn. 541 , ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , .
Gallagher v. Irish-American Bank 81 N.W. 1057 Minn. 1900
See Manwaring v. O’Brien, 75 Minn. 542 , .