Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 82 N.W. 1099.

26 citing documents.

State v. Northwest Linseed Co. 297 N.W. 635 Minn. 1941
State v. Northwest Linseed Co. 297 N.W. 635 Minn. 1941
Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40, 43 , ; Baldinger v. Rockford Ins.
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court 287 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court 287 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , ; Hunter v. City of Tracy, 104 Minn. 378 , .
Freeman v. Township of Pine City 286 N.W. 299 Minn. 1939
Freeman v. Township of Pine City 286 N.W. 299 Minn. 1939
Two years before this town line road was laid out, Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , , was decided, involving a town line road.
Peterson v. Board of Supervisors 272 N.W. 391 Minn. 1937
Peterson v. Board of Supervisors 272 N.W. 391 Minn. 1937
229 ; Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , 82 N.W.
Bruns v. Town of Nicollet 231 N.W. 924 Minn. 1930
Bruns v. Town of Nicollet 231 N.W. 924 Minn. 1930
In Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40, 44 , , the court adopted the rule stated in Elliott, Roads and Streets, 242, 244 (see 4 ed. §§ 358-359) as follows: “Where notice is required, it is essential to confer jurisdiction, for without some notice there is no jurisdiction, and the proceedings are absolutely void.
Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. City of East Grand Forks 136 N.W. 1103 Minn. 1912
Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. City of East Grand Forks 136 N.W. 1103 Minn. 1912
Burkleo v. County of Washington, 38 Minn. 441, 443 , ; Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , ; State v. School District, 85 Minn. 230 , ; Hause v. City of St.
State ex rel. Hughes v. Reusswig 126 N.W. 279 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Hughes v. Reusswig 126 N.W. 279 Minn. 1910
799 ; Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40, 43 , ; Hunter v. City of Tracy, 104 Minn. 378, 380, 381 , .
Baldwin v. Board of Supervisors 124 N.W. 641 Minn. 1910
Baldwin v. Board of Supervisors 124 N.W. 641 Minn. 1910
In reaching this conclusion we have not overlooked the case of Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , , cited, by the interveners.
Hunter v. City of Tracy 116 N.W. 922 Minn. 1908
Hunter v. City of Tracy 116 N.W. 922 Minn. 1908
Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 43 , .
Town of Tyrone v. Burns 113 N.W. 695 Minn. 1907
Town of Tyrone v. Burns 113 N.W. 695 Minn. 1907
In Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , , we held that landowners who were properly served with notice could not impeach the proceedings on the ground that others were not notified.
Krenik v. Board of Supervisors 104 N.W. 130 Minn. 1905
Krenik v. Board of Supervisors 104 N.W. 130 Minn. 1905
On the other hand, in the cases of Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , , and Thompson v. Town of Berlin, 87 Minn. 7 , , this court, construing section 1809, supra, held that it is the fact of service of the notice, and not the proof of service, which gives the supervisors jurisdiction to hear and decide the petition.
Anderson v. Supervisors of San Francisco 99 N.W. 420 Minn. 1904
Anderson v. Supervisors of San Francisco 99 N.W. 420 Minn. 1904
Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 45 , ; Burkleo v. County of Washington, 38 Minn. 442 , .
Thompson v. Town of Berlin 91 N.W. 25 Minn. 1902
Thompson v. Town of Berlin 91 N.W. 25 Minn. 1902
Town of Haven v. Orton, 37 Minn. 445 , ; Hurst v. Town of Martinsburg, 80 Minn. 40 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by