DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McMurran v. Bourne, 84 N.W. 338.

36 citing documents.

  • Sommers v. Thomas 88 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1958
  • Sommers v. Thomas 88 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1958
    11 Extended delays did not prevent the court from granting relief by opening default judgments and giving parties leave to answer in the following Minnesota cases: Pilney v. Funk, 212 Minn. 398 , 3 N. W. (2d) 792 (3 years); Isensee Motors v. Rand, 196 Minn. 267 , Foster v. Coughran, 113 Minn. 433 , McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , Welch v. Marks, 39 Minn. 481
  • Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. Swanson 26 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1947
  • Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. Swanson 26 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1947
    Flanery v. Kusha, 147 Minn. 156 , ; Kipp v. Clinger, 97 Minn. 135 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Wieland v. Shillock, 23 Minn. 227 ; Victory Bldg.
  • High v. Supreme Lodge 290 N.W. 425 Minn. 1940
  • High v. Supreme Lodge 290 N.W. 425 Minn. 1940
    Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 145 Minn. 74 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • Green v. Green 190 N.W. 989 Minn. 1922
  • Green v. Green 190 N.W. 989 Minn. 1922
    McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 145 Minn. 74 , .
  • Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 176 N.W. 153 Minn. 1920
  • Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 176 N.W. 153 Minn. 1920
    In application of these principles it has been held that an affidavit of merits may be dispensed with, where there is an answer, verified upon knowledge, People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , Forin v. City of Duluth, 66 Minn. 54 , , or where defensive facts are set forth in an affidavit of one having knowledge, McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , , or where the conduct of the other party shows weakness in his case, as where he set up a counterclaim in excess of the demand in the complaint,
  • Standard Lithographing & Printing Co. v. Twin City Motor Speedway Co. 164 N.W. 986 Minn. 1917
  • Standard Lithographing & Printing Co. v. Twin City Motor Speedway Co. 164 N.W. 986 Minn. 1917
    Lathrop v. O’Brien, 47 Minn. 428 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Queal & Co. v. Bulen, 89 Minn. 477 , ; Fink v. Woods, 102 Minn. 374 , ; Doherty v. Ryan, 123 Minn. 471 , .
  • Northwest Thresher Co. v. Herding 148 N.W. 57 Minn. 1914
  • Northwest Thresher Co. v. Herding 148 N.W. 57 Minn. 1914
    666; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Oppliger 144 N.W. 743 Minn. 1914
  • Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Oppliger 144 N.W. 743 Minn. 1914
    § 5013; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co. 99 Minn. 272 , .
  • Clifford v. Great Northern Railway Co. 136 N.W. 260 Minn. 1912
  • Clifford v. Great Northern Railway Co. 136 N.W. 260 Minn. 1912
    Sheldon v. Risedorph, 23 Minn. 518 ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry, 90 Minn. 301 , ; Trainor v. Maturen, 100 Minn. 127 , ; Fink v. Woods, 102 Minn. 374, 376 , .
  • Fink v. Woods 113 N.W. 909 Minn. 1907
  • Fink v. Woods 113 N.W. 909 Minn. 1907
    McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • Walsh v. Boyle 103 N.W. 506 Minn. 1905
  • Walsh v. Boyle 103 N.W. 506 Minn. 1905
    And see also G. S. 1894, § 5267; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Potter v. Holmes, 74 Minn. 508 , ; Baxter v. Chute, 50 Minn. 164 , ; Hildebrandt v. Robbecke, 20 Minn. 83 (100).
  • McClure v. Clarke 101 N.W. 951 Minn. 1904
  • McClure v. Clarke 101 N.W. 951 Minn. 1904
    The following cases illustrate in many phases the rule adopted: Altmann v. Gabriel, 28 Minn. 132 , ; People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Osman v. Wisted, 78 Minn. 295 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry, 90 Minn. 301 , ; White v. Gurney, 92 Minn. 271 , .
  • Hoyt v. Lightbody 101 N.W. 304 Minn. 1904
  • Hoyt v. Lightbody 101 N.W. 304 Minn. 1904
    The merits, however, of this controversy are not now before us. McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • White v. Gurney 99 N.W. 889 Minn. 1904
  • White v. Gurney 99 N.W. 889 Minn. 1904
    Paul, 67 Minn. 368 , ; Milwaukee H. Co. v. Schroeder, 72 Minn. 393 , ; Potter v. Holmes, 74 Minn. 508 , ; Hull v. Chapel, 77 Minn. 159 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • Peru Plow & Implement Co. v. King 97 N.W. 373 Minn. 1903
  • Peru Plow & Implement Co. v. King 97 N.W. 373 Minn. 1903
    Reagan v. Madden, 17 Minn. 378 (402); Milwaukee Harvester Co. v. Schroeder, 72 Minn. 393 , ; Hull v. Chapel, 77 Minn. 159 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry 96 N.W. 794 Minn. 1903
  • Crane & Ordway Co. v. Sauntry 96 N.W. 794 Minn. 1903
    Co. v. Ashton, 55 Minn. 75 , ; Rhodes v. Walsh, 58 Minn. 196 , ; Forin v. City of Duluth, 66 Minn. 54 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , .
  • J. H. Queal & Co. v. Bulen 95 N.W. 310 Minn. 1903
  • J. H. Queal & Co. v. Bulen 95 N.W. 310 Minn. 1903
    Lathrop v. O’Brien, 47 Minn. 428 , ; McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 518 , .
  • Wood v. Schoenauer 88 N.W. 411 Minn. 1901
  • Wood v. Schoenauer 88 N.W. 411 Minn. 1901
    McMurran v. Bourne, 81 Minn. 515 , ; Baxter v. Chute, 50 Minn. 164 , ; Milwaukee Harvester Co. v. Schroeder, 72 Minn. 393 , ; Hull v. Chapel, 77 Minn. 159 , .