Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 85 N.W. 826.

40 citing documents.

Bimberg v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 14 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1944
Bimberg v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 14 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1944
Compo-Board Co. 83 Minn. 25 , 85 N.W.
Nelson v. Wm. H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 251 N.W. 534 Minn. 1933
Nelson v. Wm. H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 251 N.W. 534 Minn. 1933
Co. 107 Minn. 214 , , (plunger in bag-turning machine; plaintiff slipped and in an effort to save herself hand came in contact with plunger); Carlin v. Kennedy, 97 Minn. 141 , (employe’s hand caught in unguarded ironing mangle in laundry); Christianson v. N. W. Compo-Board Co. 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 A. S. R. 440 (unguarded circular saw; plaintiff lost his balance and struck arm against saw).
Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 237 N.W. 846 Minn. 1931
Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 237 N.W. 846 Minn. 1931
Bryant v. American Surety Co. 69 Minn. 30 , 71 *
Johnson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 145 N.W. 628 Minn. 1914
Johnson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 145 N.W. 628 Minn. 1914
Christianson v. N. W. Compo-Board Co. 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Security Trust Co. v. St. Paul Building Co. 133 N.W. 861 Minn. 1911
Security Trust Co. v. St. Paul Building Co. 133 N.W. 861 Minn. 1911
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co. 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Peterson v. Merchants Elevator Co. 126 N.W. 534 Minn. 1910
Peterson v. Merchants Elevator Co. 126 N.W. 534 Minn. 1910
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Snyder v. Waldorf Box Board Co. 124 N.W. 450 Minn. 1910
Snyder v. Waldorf Box Board Co. 124 N.W. 450 Minn. 1910
Christianson v. N. W. Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Glockner v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co. 122 N.W. 465 Minn. 1909
Glockner v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co. 122 N.W. 465 Minn. 1909
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., *34 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 120 N.W. 360 Minn. 1909
Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 120 N.W. 360 Minn. 1909
In Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25, 27 , , 85 Am.
Abel v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co. 120 N.W. 359 Minn. 1909
Abel v. Hardwood Manufacturing Co. 120 N.W. 359 Minn. 1909
Christianson v. *216 Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Bean v. Keller Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 801 Minn. 1909
Bean v. Keller Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 801 Minn. 1909
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Jacobson v. Merrill & Ring Mill Co. 119 N.W. 510 Minn. 1909
Jacobson v. Merrill & Ring Mill Co. 119 N.W. 510 Minn. 1909
McGinty v. Waterman, 93 Minn. 242 , ; Christianson v. Northwestern C. B. Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Davidson v. Flour City Ornamental Iron Works 119 N.W. 483 Minn. 1909
Davidson v. Flour City Ornamental Iron Works 119 N.W. 483 Minn. 1909
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Callopy v. Atwood 117 N.W. 238 Minn. 1908
Callopy v. Atwood 117 N.W. 238 Minn. 1908
Our views of the case find support in the following decisions: Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
47; Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , , 85 Am.
Campbell v. Railway Transfer Co. 104 N.W. 547 Minn. 1905
Campbell v. Railway Transfer Co. 104 N.W. 547 Minn. 1905
The question is, did he know, or ought he, in the exercise of ordinary common sense and -prudence, to have known, the risks to which the condition of the Instrumentalities exposed him.” Wuotilla v. Duluth Lumber Co., 37 Minn. 153, 155 , ; Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , ; Sneda v. Libera, 65 Minn. 337 , ; Newhart v. St.
McGinty v. Waterman 101 N.W. 300 Minn. 1904
McGinty v. Waterman 101 N.W. 300 Minn. 1904
This statute was again under consideration in Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25, 27 , .
Jensen v. Regan 99 N.W. 1126 Minn. 1904
Jensen v. Regan 99 N.W. 1126 Minn. 1904
*327 The case is distinguished from Wuotilla v. Duluth Lumber Co., 37 Minn. 153 , , and Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , .
Bredeson v. C. A. Smith Lumber Co. 97 N.W. 977 Minn. 1904
Bredeson v. C. A. Smith Lumber Co. 97 N.W. 977 Minn. 1904
Christianson v. Northwestern Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , .
Blom v. Yellowstone Park Ass'n 90 N.W. 397 Minn. 1902
Blom v. Yellowstone Park Ass'n 90 N.W. 397 Minn. 1902
Co., 80 Minn. 1 , ; Christianson v. N. W. Compo-Board Co., 83 Minn. 25 , .