Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swanson v. Andrus, 86 N.W. 465.

30 citing documents.

Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
See also Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505, 510 , 86 N.W.
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; 5 Corbin, Contracts, § 1048.” In Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513 , defendant Maxwell modified the propellers of plaintiff’s airplane in order to improve their synchronization.
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1971
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1971
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; Varco v. Chicago, M. & St.
Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison Company 170 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1969
Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison Company 170 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1969
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; 5 Corbin, Contracts, § 1048.
Integrity Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Integrity Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
Integrity relies for recovery on the following cases: Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , 86 N.W.
Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 160 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1968
549.09, provides as follows: “When the judgment is for the recovery of money, including a judgment for the recovery of taxes, interest from the time of the verdict or report until, judgment is finally entered shall be computed by the clerk and added thereto.” Integrity relies for recovery on the following cases: Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 ; Hallada v. G. N. Ry.
Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Morse 111 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1961
Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Morse 111 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1961
6 Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 ; 10 Dunnell, Dig.
Dick Weatherston's Associated Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance 100 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1960
Dick Weatherston's Associated Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance 100 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1960
Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; Periodical Press Co. v. Sherman-Elliott Co. 143 Minn. 489 , ; Johnson v. Wright, 175 Minn. 236 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 51 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1952
Lacey v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 51 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1952
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; 5 Corbin, Contracts, § 1048, p. 251.
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 29 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1947
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 29 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1947
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , .
Periodical Press Co. v. Sherman-Elliott Co. 174 N.W. 516 Minn. 1919
Periodical Press Co. v. Sherman-Elliott Co. 174 N.W. 516 Minn. 1919
Ct. 81, 2S L. ed. 168; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , .
Grand Forks Lumber Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 115 N.W. 406 Minn. 1908
Grand Forks Lumber Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 115 N.W. 406 Minn. 1908
Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , , where the rule is stated.
Bull v. Rich 100 N.W. 213 Minn. 1904
Bull v. Rich 100 N.W. 213 Minn. 1904
In the case of Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , , the question of interest upon unliquidated claims is considered; and the general rule is there stated that so long as a demand rested upon a contingency, and was not ascertainable by general, recognized standards, such as market value, interest would not commenccto run until such definite period was f
Swanson v. Andrus 87 N.W. 363 Minn. 1901
Swanson v. Andrus 87 N.W. 363 Minn. 1901
The plaintiff appealed to this court, giving a supersedeas bond, from the order granting conditionally the defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the order on the hearing of his appeal was affirmed in this court ( 83 Minn. 505 , ), and the remittitur filed in the district court on July 2, 1901, and on the same day, and not before, he filed with the clerk a written agreement consenting that the verdict might be reduced as required by the order.
Smith v. Betcher 25 N.W. 347 Minn. 1885
Smith v. Betcher 25 N.W. 347 Minn. 1885
Wright v. Jewell, 83 Minn. 505 .