Pieper v. Lind
Cited by
- Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
- First National Bank in Moorhead v. F. M. Distributors, Inc. 124 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1963
- Misgen v. Herda 108 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1961
- Anderson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance 106 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1960
- Donovan v. Dixon 99 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1959
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. District Court 257 N.W. 277 Minn. 1934
- In Re Estate of Firle 253 N.W. 889 Minn. 1934
- Lundblad v. Erickson 230 N.W. 473 Minn. 1930
- McClearn v. Arnold 217 N.W. 106 Minn. 1927
- Winegar v. Martin 182 N.W. 513 Minn. 1921
- Ewert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 150 N.W. 224 Minn. 1914
- Scott v. Miller Liquor Co. 142 N.W. 817 Minn. 1913
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. Butchart 68 Minn. 303
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. In garnishment proceedings o.riginally brought in justice’s court a judgment was rendered against both the garnishee and the defendant. The latter appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone, and this judgment was reversed. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment thereupon entered. The clerk of the district court certifies up copies of a number of papers on file in his office, including a copy of the order of the district court reversing the judgment of the justice court, and ordering judgment for the defendant; and he also certifies a copy of the judgment thereafter entered. This is not in compliance with the rule as to the sufficiency of a return laid down in Pabst Brewing Co. v. Butchart, 68 Minn. 303 , 71 N. W. 273 . The presumption is that the judgment was warranted and was authorized. That it was not cannot be made to appear by a return to this court which does npt purport to contain a copy of the judgment roll filed in the clerk’s office and of all of the papers and files which should be made a part thereof. For this reason the appeal is dismissed..