Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Terryll v. City of Faribault, 87 N.W. 917.
-
Blue v. Loxton
223 N.W.2d 129
Minn. 1974
1 We have held that to revive a claim discharged in bankruptcy the language used must be “clear and unequivocal, and express a distinct intention to recognize payment of the debt.” Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343, 345
- Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company 197 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1972
-
Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company
197 N.W.2d 438
Minn. 1972
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341
- Hirth v. Village of Long Prairie 143 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1966
-
Hirth v. Village of Long Prairie
143 N.W.2d 205
Minn. 1966
Paul, 118 Minn. 207 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Olcott v. City of St.
- White v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1965
-
White v. Johnson
137 N.W.2d 674
Minn. 1965
Co. v. City of Minneapolis, supra; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, supra; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , .
- State v. Bentley 45 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1950
-
State v. Bentley
45 N.W.2d 185
Minn. 1950
Cf. Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; G. N. Ry.
- Johnson v. City of Chisholm 24 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1946
-
Johnson v. City of Chisholm
24 N.W.2d 232
Minn. 1946
Paul, 118 Minn. 207 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Olcott v. City of St.
- State v. Prickett 21 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
-
State v. Prickett
21 N.W.2d 474
Minn. 1946
Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
- Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
-
Kozisek v. Brigham
237 N.W. 25
Minn. 1931
Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Adamson v. Sundby, 51 Minn. 460 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, 54 Minn. 75 , ; Maxwell v. Schwartz, 55 Minn. 414 , ; *460 Bradley v. Norris, 67 Minn. 48 , ; Hibbs v. Marpe, 84 Minn. 178 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Orr v. Sutton, 127 Minn. 37 , , Ann. Cas.
- Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis 151 N.W. 976 Minn. 1915
-
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis
151 N.W. 976
Minn. 1915
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 81 Minn. 519 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , ; Wornecka v. City of St.
- Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
-
Orr v. Sutton
148 N.W. 1066
Minn. 1914
In Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , , it is said: “The case was bere on a former appeal and tbe notice of claim for damages was beld sufficient.
- Wornecka v. City of St. Paul 136 N.W. 561 Minn. 1912
-
Wornecka v. City of St. Paul
136 N.W. 561
Minn. 1912
Terryll v. City of Fairibault, 84 Minn. 341 , .
- Kandelin v. City of Ely 124 N.W. 449 Minn. 1910
-
Kandelin v. City of Ely
124 N.W. 449
Minn. 1910
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , .
-
Pearsall v. Tabour
108 N.W. 808
Minn. 1906
Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343 , ; Allen v. Ferguson, 18 Wall.
-
International Harvester Co. of America v. Lyman
96 N.W. 87
Minn. 1903
Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343
-
Evans v. Staalle
92 N.W. 951
Minn. 1903
§§ 242-244; Smith v. Stanchfield, 84 Minn. 343 , .