Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reed v. City of Anoka, 88 N.W. 981.

26 citing documents.

Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , .
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
8 Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294, 301 , ; Bayne v. Board of Co. Commrs.
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
Western States Utilities Co. v. City of Waseca 65 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1954
It is therefore clear that the legislature recognized and considered the rule established in Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , , and St.
Struble v. Nelson 15 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1944
Struble v. Nelson 15 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1944
Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , ; Railroad Comm.
Ambrozich v. City of Eveleth 274 N.W. 635 Minn. 1937
Ambrozich v. City of Eveleth 274 N.W. 635 Minn. 1937
Paul Gaslight Co. v. McCardy, 62 Minn. 509 , , a contract for lighting a courthouse and city hall for three years was upheld; Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , (contract for city water and hydrants for period of 31 years); Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls, 186 Minn. 209 , (contract for purchase of electricity for period of 15 years).
McNaught v. City of St. James 270 N.W. 897 Minn. 1936
McNaught v. City of St. James 270 N.W. 897 Minn. 1936
As such, the city in performing such business does not exercise its legislative functions, “but only its business or proprietary powers, to which the rules and principles of law applicable to contracts and transactions betAveen individuals apply.” Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294, 298 , .
City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 265 N.W. 58 Minn. 1936
City of Staples v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 265 N.W. 58 Minn. 1936
Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , ; City of Crookston v. Crookston Water Works, P. & L. Co. 150 Minn. 347 , .
Williams v. Village of Kenyon 244 N.W. 558 Minn. 1932
Williams v. Village of Kenyon 244 N.W. 558 Minn. 1932
Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , .
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 242 N.W. 714 Minn. 1932
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Granite Falls 242 N.W. 714 Minn. 1932
Franchises, in the sense now important, can come only from government; and in a transaction such as this “a municipality does not exercise its legislative functions * * * but only its business or proprietary powers, to Avhich the rules and principles of law applicable to contracts and transactions between individuals apply.” Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294, 298 , .
City of Crookston v. Crookston Water Works, Power & Light Co. 185 N.W. 380 Minn. 1921
City of Crookston v. Crookston Water Works, Power & Light Co. 185 N.W. 380 Minn. 1921
Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , ; Anoka Waterworks, etc. Co. v. City of Anoka, 109 Fed.
City of East Grand Forks v. Luck 107 N.W. 393 Minn. 1906
City of East Grand Forks v. Luck 107 N.W. 393 Minn. 1906
This court has recently recognized the rule in Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , , and Powell v. City of Duluth, 91 Minn. 53 , .
Brown v. Fitcher 97 N.W. 416 Minn. 1903
Brown v. Fitcher 97 N.W. 416 Minn. 1903
*44 Webb v. School District, 83 Minn. 111 , ; Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , ; 1 Dillon, Mun.
Bayne v. Board of County Commissioners 95 N.W. 456 Minn. 1903
Bayne v. Board of County Commissioners 95 N.W. 456 Minn. 1903
of Aitkin Co., 69 Minn. 297 , ; Reed v. City of Anoka, 85 Minn. 294 , .