Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Taylor v. Mitchell, 83 N.W. 418.

30 citing documents.

B & S Rigging & Erection, Inc. v. Wydella 353 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
B & S Rigging & Erection, Inc. v. Wydella 353 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The court said: It was held (in Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , 83 N.W.
Snyder Electric Co. v. Fleming 305 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1981
Snyder Electric Co. v. Fleming 305 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1981
2 And, in Taylor v. Fanning, where the suit was by a receiver, the court quoted from Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , 83 N.W.
Swanson v. Tomlinson Lumber Mills, Inc. 239 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1976
Swanson v. Tomlinson Lumber Mills, Inc. 239 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1976
In ruling for the receiver, this court said: “Testing this case by the rule laid down in Taylor v. Mitchell, [ 80 Minn. 492 , ], it would seem that the court below was in error.
Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. Kotz 23 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1946
Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. Kotz 23 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1946
Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , .
Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Co. v. A. Wells Co. 15 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1944
Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Co. v. A. Wells Co. 15 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1944
Co. and Minnesota L. T. Co. v. Peteler Car Co. supra; Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , 83 N.W.
Young v. Blandin 9 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1943
Young v. Blandin 9 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1943
Exposition, 79 Minn. 488 , , 50 L. R. A. 273; Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , ; 13 Am.
Watson v. Gardner 236 N.W. 213 Minn. 1931
Watson v. Gardner 236 N.W. 213 Minn. 1931
In Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , , and Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , , it is held that such books are competent evidence to show not only the falsity of representations as to the condition of the corporation, but also as a basis for expert testimony as to the condition of a bank and the value of its shares.
Ebert-Hicken Co. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Mining Co. 224 N.W. 454 Minn. 1929
Ebert-Hicken Co. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Mining Co. 224 N.W. 454 Minn. 1929
79 Minn. 488 , , 50 L. R. A. 273; Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , .
Fraser v. Farmers Co-Operative Co. 223 N.W. 785 Minn. 1929
Fraser v. Farmers Co-Operative Co. 223 N.W. 785 Minn. 1929
The case does not come within the rule of Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , , to the effect that when a corporation is insolvent its directors who are also its creditors cannot, by taking advantage of their position, secure to themselves a preference over other creditors.
Marin v. Calmenson 197 N.W. 262 Minn. 1924
Marin v. Calmenson 197 N.W. 262 Minn. 1924
They may be open to attack on that ground, *286 Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , , but that is a matter not involved in this appeal.
Aiken v. Timm 180 N.W. 234 Minn. 1920
Aiken v. Timm 180 N.W. 234 Minn. 1920
Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , ; Minnesota L. & T. Co. v. Peteler Car Co. 132 Minn. 277 , .
Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Peteler Car Co. 156 N.W. 255 Minn. 1916
Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Peteler Car Co. 156 N.W. 255 Minn. 1916
The case of Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 493 , , illustrates a situation where the act of the directors in taking a mortgage for their own benefit to secure a prior debt was fraudulent as to creditors; or, if not fraudulent in fact, voidable in the interest of creditors because of the violation by the directors of their fiduciary obligation and the resultant harm
Savage v. Madelia Farmers' Warehouse Co. 108 N.W. 296 Minn. 1906
Savage v. Madelia Farmers' Warehouse Co. 108 N.W. 296 Minn. 1906
Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , .
Taylor v. Fanning 91 N.W. 269 Minn. 1902
Taylor v. Fanning 91 N.W. 269 Minn. 1902
COLLINS, J. The plaintiff in this case was also plaintiff in Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , .
Klein v. Funk 84 N.W. 460 Minn. 1900
Klein v. Funk 84 N.W. 460 Minn. 1900
Janney v. Minneapolis Exposition, 79 Minn. 488 , ; Taylor v. Mitchell, 80 Minn. 492 , .