DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Taylor v. City of Mankato, 83 N.W. 1084.

17 citing documents.

  • Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Hvidsten 129 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1964
    See, also, Tiedt v. Johnson, 151 Minn. 288 , ; Germania Bank v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , .
  • Behrendt v. Ahlstrand 118 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1962
  • Behrendt v. Ahlstrand 118 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1962
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; McKenzie v. City of Northfield, 30 Minn. 456 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Williams v. Minneapolis St.
  • Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
  • Campion v. City of Rochester 277 N.W. 422 Minn. 1938
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. *139 20, ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Murphy v. City of South St.
  • School District No. 1 v. Security State Bank 233 N.W. 296 Minn. 1930
    To the point that the bond was only a part of a single transaction or contract and, that being so, parol evidence was admissible to *545 prove the entire contract and its application to the subject matter, respondents cite, among other cases, Germania Bank v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , ; Potter v. Easton, 82 Minn. 247 , ; Drovers C. L. & T. Co. v. McGraw, 150 Minn. 50 , ; McGrath v. Pothen, 168 Minn. 206 , ; Wilmot v. Minneapolis A. T. Assn. 169 Minn. 140 , .
  • Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
  • Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
    Co. 28 Minn. 98 , ; McKenzie v. City of Northfield, 30 Minn. 456 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; Williams v. Minneapolis St.
  • McDonough v. City of St. Paul 330 N.W. 89 Minn. 1930
  • McDonough v. City of St. Paul 330 N.W. 89 Minn. 1930
    The fact that no safe way Avas open to her takes this case out of the doctrine of the cases above cited and brings it Avithin the doctrine of Taylor v. City of Mankato, 81 Minn. 276 , ; and Hufman v. City of Crookston, 113 Minn. 232 , .
  • Tiedt v. Johnson 186 N.W. 779 Minn. 1922
    Germania Bank v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , ; Shove v. Martine, 85 Minn. 29 , ; Backus v. Sternberg, 59 Minn. 403 , ; State Bank v. Pangerl, 139 Minn. 19 , ; Almich v. Downey, 45 Minn. 460 , .
  • Drovers Cattle, Loan & Investment Co. v. McGraw 184 N.W. 365 Minn. 1921
    The following cases are in point: Healy v. Young, 21 Minn. 389 ; Gammon v. Ganfield, 42 Minn. 368 , ; Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , .
  • Independent Harvester Co. v. Malzohn 179 N.W. 727 Minn. 1920
    Jordan v. White, 20 Minn. 77 (91); Healy v. Young, 21 Minn. 389 ; Gammon v. Ganfield, 42 Minn. 368 , ; Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , ; Rines v. Ferrell, 107 Minn. 251 , ; French v. Yale, 124 Minn. 63 , ; W. W. Kimball Co. v. Massey, 126 Minn. 461 , .
  • Giltner v. Quirk 155 N.W. 760 Minn. 1915
    See Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , ; Conrad v. Clarke, 106 Minn. 430 , .
  • Distinguished Security National Bank of Minneapolis v. Pulver 155 N.W. 641 Minn. 1915
    Cases like Shove v. Martine, 85 Minn. 29 , , and Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , , relied on by defendant, are clearly distinguishable.
  • Samuel H. Chute Co. v. Latta 142 N.W. 1048 Minn. 1913
    Defendant relies much on the case of Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , .
  • McNaughton v. Wahl 108 N.W. 467 Minn. 1906
    The cases of Healy v. Young, 21 Minn. 389 , and Germania Bank v. Osborne, 81 Minn. 272 , , are cited in support of this claim.