Cited by

Co. 103 Minn. 120 , ; Eitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co. 104 Minn. 138 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co. 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Hess v. Adamant Mnfg.

Co. 63 Minn. 428 , ); if a servant to whom a nondelegable duty has not been assigned renders the place of work for a fellow servant unsafe, the master is not responsible (Perras v. A. Booth & Co. 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Berneche v. Hilliard, 101 Minn. 366 , ); and one who is engaged in performing the ordinary-duties of the work carried on is a fellow servant even if he be a foreman (Doerr v. Daily News Pub.

*396 Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Borgerson v. Cook Stone Co., 91 Minn. 91 , ; Dixon v. Union Ironworks, 90 Minn. 492 , .

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Renlund v. Commodore Mining Co., 89 Minn. 41 , , 99 Am.

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , , and Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , .

And see Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191, 195 , , ; Rahman v. Minnesota & N. W. R. Co., 43 Minn. 42, 44 , ; Erickson v. St.

Lindvall v. Woods, 41 Minn. 212 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Brown v. Minneapolis & St.

As remarked in Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , , if the employee or servant is clothed with special power and authority in the conduct of the master’s business, in and about which is involved the absolute duty of the master to other servants with respect to the obligation to provide them with safe instrumentalities and a safe place in

The facts bring the case within the decision in Borgerson v. Cook Stone Co., 91 Minn. 91 , , and Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , .

Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , ; Peterson v. American Grass Twine Co., 90 Minn. 343 , ; Borgerson v. Cook Stone Co., 91 Minn. 91 , .

Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , 85 N. W; 179; Gray v. Commutator Co., 85 Minn. 463 , 89 N. W. *311 322 ; Blom v. Yellowstone Park Assn., 86 Minn. 237 , ; Kerrigan v. Chicago, M. & St.

The law as now recognized and applied in this state on this subject has been stated as follows by Justice BROWN in Perras v. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191, 196 , , : “An employee or servant who is clothed with special powers and authority with respect to- the management of the master’s business and the control of his other servants in the matter of the performance of their work, and to whom is delegated the performance of the master’s absolute

In Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , , it was said that an employee or servant who is clothed with special powers and authority with respect to the management of the master’s business, and the control of the other servants in the matter of the performance of their duties, and to whom is delegated the performance of the maste

Co., 66 Minn. 79 , ; Perras v. A. Booth & Co., 82 Minn. 191 , , .