DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Arne v. Holland, 89 N.W. 3.

27 citing documents.

  • Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
  • Currier v. Currier 136 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1965
  • Currier v. Currier 136 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1965
    See, Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540, 543 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417, 419 ; Jones v. Jones, 242 Minn. 251, 264 , 64 N. W. (2d) 508, 516 .
  • Gumphrey v. Gumphrey 115 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1962
  • Gumphrey v. Gumphrey 115 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1962
    Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , ; In re Adoption of Jaren, 223 Minn. 561 , 27 N. W. (2d) 656 .
  • Jordet v. Wilkinson 80 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1957
  • Jordet v. Wilkinson 80 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1957
    The court had the benefit of this investigation and a report from the commissioner of public welfare both on the fitness of the petitioner, *442 Merton C. Jordet, as an adopting parent, and Elsie, his wife, as the consenting petitioner and natural mother of Kobert, Jr. In Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401, 404 , , this court said in regard to the line of inquiry to be pursued where the child’s interests demand a modification of custody and visitation privileges involved in a former divorce decree: “
  • Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
  • Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
    Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , 89 N.W.
  • Thompson v. Thompson 55 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1952
  • Thompson v. Thompson 55 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1952
    In Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , , custody of a minor child had been awarded to the mother and father alternately over a period of years.
  • In Re Adoption of Jaren 27 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1947
  • Peterson v. Jaren 27 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1947
  • Peterson v. Jaren 27 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1947
    There, citing Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , , we said ( 151 Minn. 462 , ) : “* * * that decrees of divorce are entered in pursuance of and are founded upon the statute, which affords a short and speedy remedy; that the ultimate question is, do the child’s interests demand a modification of a former order; that the court is not limited
  • In Re Adoption of Jaren 27 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1947
    There, citing Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , 89 N.W.
  • State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
  • State Ex Rel. Herniman v. Markson 244 N.W. 687 Minn. 1932
    Flint v. Flint, 63 Minn. 187 , ; Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , ; State ex rel.
  • Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
  • Spratt v. Spratt 185 N.W. 509 Minn. 1921
    Referring to the statute, in Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , , it was said in substance that it contemplated a modification of the order for due cause at any time; that decrees of divorce are entered in pursuance of and are founded upon the statute, which affords a short and speedy remedy; that the ultimate question is, do.
  • Waldref v. Waldref 159 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1916
  • Waldref v. Waldref 159 N.W. 1068 Minn. 1916
    “The test to determine the validity of the court’s order in such proceedings *474 is, was there an abuse of discretion?” Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , .
  • Olsen v. Nelson 146 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1914
  • Olsen v. Nelson 146 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1914
    Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401, 404 , .
  • Gauthier v. Walter 124 N.W. 634 Minn. 1910
  • Gauthier v. Walter 124 N.W. 634 Minn. 1910
    State v. Flint, 63 Minn. 187 , ; Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , ; State v. Anderson, 89 Minn. 198 , .
  • State ex rel. Anderson v. Anderson 94 N.W. 681 Minn. 1903
  • State ex rel. Anderson v. Anderson 94 N.W. 681 Minn. 1903
    *200 In State v. Flint, 63 Minn. 187 , , and Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , , the rule was adopted that, although the statute gives the parents the care and custody of their minor children, yet the right is not absolute, the essential thing being the welfare of the children.