Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Douglas v. Westfall, 89 N.W. 175.

70 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437, 438 , 89 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Mattson v. Kiedrowski 391 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1986
State Ex Rel. Mattson v. Kiedrowski 391 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1986
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , 89 N.W.
Clerk of Court's Comp. for LC v. LC Com'rs 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437, 446
Clerk of Court's Comp. for LC v. LC Com'rs 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437, 446 , 89 N.W.
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, decided in 1902.
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297; *198 State ex rel.
State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297; Hassler v. Engberg, 233 Minn. 487 , 48 N. W. (2d) 343 ; Burns v. City of St.
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437, 439 , , 57 L. R. A. 297: “* * It is only when the classification is so manifestly arbitrary as to evince a legislative purpose of evading the provisions of the constitution that the courts may and must declare the classification unconstitutional.
State Ex Rel. Sundberg v. District Court 241 N.W. 39 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Sundberg v. District Court 241 N.W. 39 Minn. 1932
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437, 446 , , 59 L. R. A. 297, 89 A. S. R. 571) but it is to require their appointment of officers who *402 have nothing to do with the administration of justice (State ex rel.
Rea v. Kelley 235 N.W. 910 Minn. 1931
Rea v. Kelley 235 N.W. 910 Minn. 1931
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, 89 A. S. R. 571; Baart v. Martin, 99 Minn. 197 , , 116 A. S. R. 394; Riley v. Pearson, 120 Minn. 210 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 7; Henry v. White, 123 Minn. 182 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 4; Abrahamson v. Sundman, 174 Minn. 22 , .
Horgan v. Sargent 233 N.W. 866 Minn. 1930
Horgan v. Sargent 233 N.W. 866 Minn. 1930
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, 89 A. S. R. 571; Baart v. Martin, 99 Minn. 197 , , 116 A. S. R. 394; Doyle v. Wagner, 108 Minn. 443 , ; In re Lee, 171 Minn. 182 , ; Abrahamson v. Sundman, 174 Minn. 22 , ; Dennis v. Swanson, 176 Minn. 267 , ; In re
Liquidation of Farmers State Bank of North Branch 219 N.W. 916 Minn. 1928
Liquidation of Farmers State Bank of North Branch 219 N.W. 916 Minn. 1928
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 89 A. S. R. 571, 59 L. R. A. 297; State v. Elliott, 135 Minn. 89 , ; State ex rel.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, 89 A. S. R. 571; McReavy v. Holm, 166 Minn. 22 , ; State ex rel.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Douglas v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , 89 N.W.
Petters & Co. v. Viegel 209 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
Petters & Co. v. Viegel 209 N.W. 9 Minn. 1926
State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , .” The statute does not cover bonds issued by individuals or co-partnerships, or by corporations other than those mentioned in § 7436, or bonds not secured by collateral deposited with a trustee, but these omissions are not fatal.
Jensen v. Independent School District No. 17 204 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
Jensen v. Independent School District No. 17 204 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 59 L. R. A. 297, 81 Am.
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
See also State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 297, 89 Am.
Driscoll v. Board of County Commissioners 201 N.W. 945 Minn. 1925
Driscoll v. Board of County Commissioners 201 N.W. 945 Minn. 1925
“It is only when the classification is so manifestly arbitrary as to evince a legislative purpose of evading the provisions of the constitution that the courts may and must declare the classification unconstitutional.” State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L. R. A. 277, 89 Am.
State ex rel. Flaten v. Independent School District 174 N.W. 414 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Flaten v. Independent School District 174 N.W. 414 Minn. 1919
State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 59 L.R.A.
Hammel v. Feigh 173 N.W. 570 Minn. 1919
Hammel v. Feigh 173 N.W. 570 Minn. 1919
394; State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L.R.A.
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
681; State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L.R.A.
Gard v. County of Otter Tail 144 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
Gard v. County of Otter Tail 144 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
State v. Sullivan, 72 Minn. 126 , ; State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 59 L.R.A.
Henry v. White 143 N.W. 324 Minn. 1913
Henry v. White 143 N.W. 324 Minn. 1913
State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L.R.A.
Riley v. Pearson 139 N.W. 361 Minn. 1913
Riley v. Pearson 139 N.W. 361 Minn. 1913
State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L.R.A.
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
949 , respectively, and the Minnesota law being sustained in State v. Westfall, 85 Minn. 437 , , 57 L.R.A.