Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Otte v. Hartford Life Insurance, 93 N.W. 608.

28 citing documents.

Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co. 36 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1949
Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co. 36 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1949
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 A. S. R. 532, and has since been affirmed in Enge v. John Hancock Mut.
Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co. 8 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1943
Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co. 8 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1943
Co. 88 Minn. 423, 428, 429 , , 97 A. S. R. 532; Bodine v. Exchange F. Ins.
Consolidated Lumber Co. v. Mercury Insurance Co. 249 N.W. 578 Minn. 1933
Consolidated Lumber Co. v. Mercury Insurance Co. 249 N.W. 578 Minn. 1933
Co. 88 Minn. 123 , , 97 A. S. R. 532; White v. Standard L. & A. Ins.
Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 244 N.W. 817 Minn. 1932
Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees 244 N.W. 817 Minn. 1932
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 A. S. R. 532; Finn v. Modern Brotherhood, 118 Minn. 307 , ; Mahoney v. Minnesota F. Mut.
Enge v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 236 N.W. 207 Minn. 1931
Enge v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 236 N.W. 207 Minn. 1931
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 A. S. R. 532, reads as follows: “When a foreign life insurance company has a general manager for this state, Avith authority to appoint canvassers to be paid by *122 the manager, such canvasser, while engaged in taking applications on blanks furnished by the company, is the agent of the insurer, an
Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co. 233 N.W. 858 Minn. 1930
Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co. 233 N.W. 858 Minn. 1930
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 A. S. R. 532; Zimmerman v. Bankers Cas.
Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 210 N.W. 846 Minn. 1926
Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 210 N.W. 846 Minn. 1926
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
Jepson v. Central Business Mens Assn. 209 N.W. 487 Minn. 1926
Jepson v. Central Business Mens Assn. 209 N.W. 487 Minn. 1926
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance 208 N.W. 410 Minn. 1926
MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance 208 N.W. 410 Minn. 1926
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
Shaughnessy v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 600 Minn. 1925
Shaughnessy v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 600 Minn. 1925
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
Olsson v. Midland Insurance 165 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
Olsson v. Midland Insurance 165 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
Co. 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
Parsons, Rich & Co. v. Lane 106 N.W. 485 Minn. 1906
Parsons, Rich & Co. v. Lane 106 N.W. 485 Minn. 1906
Co., 88 Minn. 423 , , 97 Am.
Mattson v. Samaritans 98 N.W. 330 Minn. 1904
Distinguished Mattson v. Samaritans 98 N.W. 330 Minn. 1904
Co., 88 Minn. 423 , , is distinguishable, for in that case the insured not only truthfully answered all questions in the application, but he had no knowledge that the agent had inserted false answers therein.
Andrus v. Maryland Casualty Co. 98 N.W. 200 Minn. 1904
Andrus v. Maryland Casualty Co. 98 N.W. 200 Minn. 1904