Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co., 95 N.W. 320.

26 citing documents.

Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
911, 913 (1933); Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co., 89 Minn. 470, 472 , 95 N.W.
Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 147 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1966
Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 147 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1966
Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Nelson v. Auman, 221 Minn. 46 , 20 N. W. (2d) 702 .
Kiesow v. Kiesow 133 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1965
Kiesow v. Kiesow 133 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1965
Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Nelson v. Auman, 221 Minn. 46 , 20 N. W. (2d) 702 ; 12 Dunnell, Dig.
Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC. 92 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC. 92 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Cunningham, Appealable Orders in Minnesota, 37 Minn. L. Rev. 309 , 324, 333, 334, 359.
Nelson v. Auman 20 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1945
Nelson v. Auman 20 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1945
Co. 89 Minn. 470, 472 , , with respect to a similar motion, this court held: * * The order could not be reviewed on an appeal from the judgment, because it was made after the judgment was entered; hence it was appealable, for it was a final order affecting a substantial right in a summary application in the action af
Spears v. Drake 258 N.W. 149 Minn. 1935
Spears v. Drake 258 N.W. 149 Minn. 1935
Muellenberg v. Joblinski 247 N.W. 570 Minn. 1933
Muellenberg v. Joblinski 247 N.W. 570 Minn. 1933
Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 224 N.W. 700 Minn. 1929
Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 224 N.W. 700 Minn. 1929
Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Truesdale v. Farmers L. & T. Co. 67 Minn. 454 , , 64 A. S. R. 430.
Bergman v. Williams 217 N.W. 127 Minn. 1927
Bergman v. Williams 217 N.W. 127 Minn. 1927
Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Van Slyke v. Andrews, 146 Minn. 316 , , 12 A. L. R. 1068; Philadelphia S. B. Co. v. Hawley, 154 Minn. 538 , .
Kelly v. Anderson 194 N.W. 102 Minn. 1923
Kelly v. Anderson 194 N.W. 102 Minn. 1923
Section 8001, G. S. 1913; Piper v. Johnston, 12 Minn. 27 (60); People’s Ice Co. v. Schlenker, 50 Minn. 1 , ; Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co. 89 Minn. 470 , ; Commissioners of Aitkin County v. Morrison, 25 Minn. 295 ; Truesdale v. Farmers L. & T. Co. 67 Minn. 454 , , 64 Am.
Collins v. School District No. 39 131 N.W. 322 Minn. 1911
Collins v. School District No. 39 131 N.W. 322 Minn. 1911
sed after judgment, it will be sustained if, by any reasonable inference or intendment, a cause of action or defense, as the case may be, can be spelled out of the matters alleged therein.” Smith v. Dennett, 15 Minn. 59 (81) ; Solomon v. Vinson, 31 Minn. 205 , ; Slater v. Olson, 83 Minn. 35 , ; Peach v. Reed, 87 Minn. 375 , ; Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co., 89 Minn. 470 , .
Bilsborrow v. Pierce 128 N.W. 16 Minn. 1910
Bilsborrow v. Pierce 128 N.W. 16 Minn. 1910
Counsel for respondents seem to rely confidently on the case of Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co., 89 Minn. 470 , , in support of their contention that the order for a modification of the judgment is res adjudicata.
Cornish v. Coates 97 N.W. 579 Minn. 1903
Cornish v. Coates 97 N.W. 579 Minn. 1903
Halvorsen v. Oronoco Mining Co., 89 Minn. 470 , .