Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baier v. Baier, 97 N.W. 671.

36 citing documents.

  • Pelowski v. Frederickson 116 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1962
  • Pelowski v. Frederickson 116 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1962
    For decisions in other than tort actions where the doctrine of marital immunity has not prevented suits between spouses, see Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Rich v. Rich, 12 Minn. 369 (468); Muus v. Muus, 29 Minn. 115 , ; see, also, McCurdy, Torts Between Persons in Domestic Relations, 43 Harv.
  • Lemke v. Lemke 108 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1961
  • Lemke v. Lemke 108 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1961
    He also cites Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , , and Hoffmann v. Hoffmann, 174 Minn. 159 , , as cases following the doctrine of Stocking v. Stocking, supra, which he contends first laid down the rule relative to desertion in this state.
  • Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
  • Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
    Barich v. Barich, 201 Minn. 34 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , .
  • Atwood v. Atwood 39 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1949
  • Atwood v. Atwood 39 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1949
    4 Bliss v. Bliss, 208 Minn. 84 , ; Barich v. Barich, 201 Minn. 34 , ; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
  • Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
  • Barich v. Barich 275 N.W. 421 Minn. 1937
  • Barich v. Barich 275 N.W. 421 Minn. 1937
    (See Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , .)
  • Pye v. Magnuson 227 N.W. 895 Minn. 1929
  • Pye v. Magnuson 227 N.W. 895 Minn. 1929
    Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Dorsey v. Dorsey, 142 Minn. 279 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , .
  • Bensel v. Hall 225 N.W. 104 Minn. 1929
  • Bensel v. Hall 225 N.W. 104 Minn. 1929
    Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Harer v. Harer, 153 Minn. 317 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , ; Hoffmann v. Hoffmann, 174 Minn. 159 , ; 2 Va.
  • Hoffmann v. Hoffmann 218 N.W. 559 Minn. 1928
  • Hoffmann v. Hoffmann 218 N.W. 559 Minn. 1928
    Stocking v. Stocking, 76 Minn. 292 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165, 167 , ; 30 C. J. p. 1072, § 862.
  • Waller v. Waller 200 N.W. 480 Minn. 1924
  • Waller v. Waller 200 N.W. 480 Minn. 1924
    This principle is fairly derivable from Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; and Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Harer v. Harer 190 N.W. 343 Minn. 1922
  • Harer v. Harer 190 N.W. 343 Minn. 1922
    We think the case is one for the application oif the rule that a wife who is justifiably living apart from her husband may maintain an action against him for her separate support, Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , , and that the court might go farther and grant a permanent separation from bed and board on the ground that defendant had abandoned his wife and refused and neglected to provide for her within the meaning of subdivision 3, § 7135, G-.
  • Eberhart v. Eberhart 183 N.W. 140 Minn. 1921
  • Eberhart v. Eberhart 183 N.W. 140 Minn. 1921
    Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Stephon v. Topic 180 N.W. 221 Minn. 1920
  • Stephon v. Topic 180 N.W. 221 Minn. 1920
    Byrnes v. Volz, 53 Minn. 110 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
  • Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
    Stephen v. Stephen, 102 Minn. 301 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
  • Jacobs v. Jacobs 161 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
  • Jacobs v. Jacobs 161 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
    Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Stephen v. Stephen, 102 Minn. 301 , ; Heinze v. Heinze, 107 Minn. 43 , ; Lang v. Lang, 70 W. Va.
  • Merriam v. Merriam 148 N.W. 478 Minn. 1914
  • Merriam v. Merriam 148 N.W. 478 Minn. 1914
    See Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Heinze v. Heinze 119 N.W. 489 Minn. 1909
  • Heinze v. Heinze 119 N.W. 489 Minn. 1909
    Fera v. Fera, 98 Mass. 155 .” And see Grant v. Grant, 53 Minn. 181 , ; Salzbrun v. Salzbrun, 81 Minn. 287 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
  • Stephen v. Stephen 113 N.W. 913 Minn. 1907
  • Stephen v. Stephen 113 N.W. 913 Minn. 1907
    In Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , , it was held that a wife who was living apart from her husband for a cause legally justifying her may maintain an equitable action against him for her separate support.