Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Baier v. Baier, 97 N.W. 671.
- Pelowski v. Frederickson 116 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1962
-
Pelowski v. Frederickson
116 N.W.2d 701
Minn. 1962
For decisions in other than tort actions where the doctrine of marital immunity has not prevented suits between spouses, see Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Rich v. Rich, 12 Minn. 369 (468); Muus v. Muus, 29 Minn. 115 , ; see, also, McCurdy, Torts Between Persons in Domestic Relations, 43 Harv.
- Lemke v. Lemke 108 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1961
-
Lemke v. Lemke
108 N.W.2d 344
Minn. 1961
He also cites Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , , and Hoffmann v. Hoffmann, 174 Minn. 159 , , as cases following the doctrine of Stocking v. Stocking, supra, which he contends first laid down the rule relative to desertion in this state.
- Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
-
Donigan v. Donigan
53 N.W.2d 635
Minn. 1952
Barich v. Barich, 201 Minn. 34 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , .
- Atwood v. Atwood 39 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1949
-
Atwood v. Atwood
39 N.W.2d 103
Minn. 1949
4 Bliss v. Bliss, 208 Minn. 84 , ; Barich v. Barich, 201 Minn. 34 , ; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
- Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
- Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
- Barich v. Barich 275 N.W. 421 Minn. 1937
-
Barich v. Barich
275 N.W. 421
Minn. 1937
(See Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , .)
- Pye v. Magnuson 227 N.W. 895 Minn. 1929
-
Pye v. Magnuson
227 N.W. 895
Minn. 1929
Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Dorsey v. Dorsey, 142 Minn. 279 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , .
- Bensel v. Hall 225 N.W. 104 Minn. 1929
-
Bensel v. Hall
225 N.W. 104
Minn. 1929
Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Harer v. Harer, 153 Minn. 317 , ; Waller v. Waller, 160 Minn. 431 , ; Hoffmann v. Hoffmann, 174 Minn. 159 , ; 2 Va.
- Hoffmann v. Hoffmann 218 N.W. 559 Minn. 1928
-
Hoffmann v. Hoffmann
218 N.W. 559
Minn. 1928
Stocking v. Stocking, 76 Minn. 292 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165, 167 , ; 30 C. J. p. 1072, § 862.
- Waller v. Waller 200 N.W. 480 Minn. 1924
-
Waller v. Waller
200 N.W. 480
Minn. 1924
This principle is fairly derivable from Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L. R. A. 1917D, 971; and Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
- Harer v. Harer 190 N.W. 343 Minn. 1922
-
Harer v. Harer
190 N.W. 343
Minn. 1922
We think the case is one for the application oif the rule that a wife who is justifiably living apart from her husband may maintain an action against him for her separate support, Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Robertson v. Robertson, 138 Minn. 290 , , and that the court might go farther and grant a permanent separation from bed and board on the ground that defendant had abandoned his wife and refused and neglected to provide for her within the meaning of subdivision 3, § 7135, G-.
- Eberhart v. Eberhart 183 N.W. 140 Minn. 1921
-
Eberhart v. Eberhart
183 N.W. 140
Minn. 1921
Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
- Stephon v. Topic 180 N.W. 221 Minn. 1920
-
Stephon v. Topic
180 N.W. 221
Minn. 1920
Byrnes v. Volz, 53 Minn. 110 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
- Robertson v. Robertson 164 N.W. 980 Minn. 1917
-
Robertson v. Robertson
164 N.W. 980
Minn. 1917
Stephen v. Stephen, 102 Minn. 301 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 136 Minn. 190 , , L.R.A.
- Jacobs v. Jacobs 161 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
-
Jacobs v. Jacobs
161 N.W. 525
Minn. 1917
Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Stephen v. Stephen, 102 Minn. 301 , ; Heinze v. Heinze, 107 Minn. 43 , ; Lang v. Lang, 70 W. Va.
- Merriam v. Merriam 148 N.W. 478 Minn. 1914
-
Merriam v. Merriam
148 N.W. 478
Minn. 1914
See Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
- Heinze v. Heinze 119 N.W. 489 Minn. 1909
-
Heinze v. Heinze
119 N.W. 489
Minn. 1909
Fera v. Fera, 98 Mass. 155 .” And see Grant v. Grant, 53 Minn. 181 , ; Salzbrun v. Salzbrun, 81 Minn. 287 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , .
- Stephen v. Stephen 113 N.W. 913 Minn. 1907
-
Stephen v. Stephen
113 N.W. 913
Minn. 1907
In Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , , it was held that a wife who was living apart from her husband for a cause legally justifying her may maintain an equitable action against him for her separate support.