Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District Court, 97 N.W. 132.

29 citing documents.

Mahmood Khan, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mahmood Khan, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Louis Cnty., 90 Minn. 457, 462, 97 N.W.
A. C. E. Equipment Co. v. Erickson 152 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1967
A. C. E. Equipment Co. v. Erickson 152 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1967
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District Court, 90 Minn. 457 , .
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District Court, 90 Minn. 457 , , this court said, citing State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Town of Lowell v. City of Crookston 91 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Town of Lowell v. City of Crookston 91 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1958
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District Court, 90 Minn. 457 , .
Shaw v. Utecht 43 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1950
Kolars v. Katolicky Delnik 266 N.W. 705 Minn. 1936
Kolars v. Katolicky Delnik 266 N.W. 705 Minn. 1936
Co. v. District Court, 90 Minn. 457 , .
Suhr v. County of Dodge 236 N.W. 463 Minn. 1931
Suhr v. County of Dodge 236 N.W. 463 Minn. 1931
Barber A. P. Co. v. District Court, 90 Minn. 457 , .
Markley v. City of St. Paul 172 N.W. 215 Minn. 1919
Markley v. City of St. Paul 172 N.W. 215 Minn. 1919
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 87 Minn. 146 , *358 ; Grant v. Berrisford, 94 Minn. 45 , ; State v. Robinson, 101 Minn. 277 , , 30 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Penney v. County of Hennepin 165 N.W. 965 Minn. 1918
Penney v. County of Hennepin 165 N.W. 965 Minn. 1918
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , ; State v. Peter, 107 Minn. 460 , , in which we said that the board in passing on claims against the county acts quasi judicially, and that when it has once finally acted, without fraud or mistake in the premises, its action is final and binds the parties, unless there be an appeal.
City of Duluth v. Orr 132 N.W. 265 Minn. 1911
City of Duluth v. Orr 132 N.W. 265 Minn. 1911
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , ; State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 87 Minn. 146 , ; State v. O'Connor, 81 Minn. 79 , .
Merz v. County of Wright 131 N.W. 635 Minn. 1911
Merz v. County of Wright 131 N.W. 635 Minn. 1911
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , , is not in point.
State ex rel. Devine v. Peter 120 N.W. 896 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Devine v. Peter 120 N.W. 896 Minn. 1909
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , .
Schigley v. City of Waseca 118 N.W. 259 Minn. 1908
Schigley v. City of Waseca 118 N.W. 259 Minn. 1908
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457, 461 , , it was *101 held that a provision in the charter of the city of Dnluth requiring the presentation of all claims to the city council for adjustment ánd allowance was a proper subject for charter supervision; and “it would seem to follow logically that it was also proper to continue the subject, an
Lamson v. Coffin 114 N.W. 248 Minn. 1907
Lamson v. Coffin 114 N.W. 248 Minn. 1907
Louis County, 90 Minn. 457 , ; Larkin v. Glens Falls Ins.
Grant v. Berrisford 101 N.W. 940 Minn. 1904
Grant v. Berrisford 101 N.W. 940 Minn. 1904
Louis Co., 90 Minn. 457 , .