DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kileen v. Kennedy, 97 N.W. 126.

36 citing documents.

  • McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    428, 429 (1903); Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414, 415 , 97 N.W.
  • Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
  • Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
    323 (1904); Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , 97 N.W.
  • Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
  • Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
    See, Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409 , ; Ferguson v. Trova-ten, 94 Minn. 209 , .
  • Haugland v. Canton 84 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1957
  • Haugland v. Canton 84 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1957
    4 Minar v. Skoog, 235 Minn. 262 , 50 N. W. (2d) 300 ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , .
  • Ruble v. Ruble 47 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1951
  • Ruble v. Ruble 47 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1951
    Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , 31 N. W. *17 690; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Henry Simons Lbr.
  • Steller v. Thomas 45 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1950
  • Steller v. Thomas 45 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1950
    Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; La Plant v. Loveland, 142 Minn. 89 , .
  • Bey v. Keeping 256 N.W. 140 Minn. 1934
  • Bey v. Keeping 256 N.W. 140 Minn. 1934
    Lanz v. McLaughlin, 14 Minn. 55 (72); Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , .
  • Johnson v. M. J. O'neil, Inc. 234 N.W. 16 Minn. 1931
  • Johnson v. M. J. O'neil, Inc. 234 N.W. 16 Minn. 1931
    Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Bastian Bros. Co. v. Wemott-Howard Co. 113 Minn. 196 , ; Lowry C. Co. v. Andresen-Ryan C. Co. 153 Minn. 498 , ; West v. First Nat.
  • Brearley v. Schoening 210 N.W. 588 Minn. 1926
  • Lloyd v. Mickelson 210 N.W. 586 Minn. 1926
  • Lloyd v. Mickelson 210 N.W. 586 Minn. 1926
    Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , .
  • Brearley v. Schoening 210 N.W. 588 Minn. 1926
    Lanz v. McLaughlin, 14 Minn. 55 (72); Hamlin v. Wistar, 31 Minn. 418 , ; Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , ; Ames & Frost Co. v. Smith, 65 Minn. 304 , ; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Lewis v. Johnson, 123 Minn. 409 , , L. R. A. 1915D, 150; Rahm v. Cummings, 131 Minn. 141 , ; Kull v. Wilson, 137 Minn. 127 , ; Lloyd v. Mickelson, supra, page 441.
  • Rosenstein v. Gottfried 176 N.W. 844 Minn. 1920
  • Rosenstein v. Gottfried 176 N.W. 844 Minn. 1920
    411; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; La Plante v. Loveland, 142 Minn. 89 , .
  • Krohn v. Dustin 172 N.W. 213 Minn. 1919
  • Krohn v. Dustin 172 N.W. 213 Minn. 1919
    Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , , and cases cited; Langellier v. Schaefer, 36 Minn. 361 , ; Hamlin v. Wistar, 31 Minn. 418 , ; Lanz v. McLaughlin, 14 Minn. 55 (72).
  • La Plant v. Loveland 170 N.W. 920 Minn. 1919
  • La Plant v. Loveland 170 N.W. 920 Minn. 1919
    411; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , .
  • Kull v. Wilson 162 N.W. 1072 Minn. 1917
  • Kull v. Wilson 162 N.W. 1072 Minn. 1917
    A proposal to accept, or an acceptance upon terms varying from those offered, is a rejection of the offer and puts an end to the negotiations, unless the party who made the original offer renews it, or properly assents to the modification suggested.” Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , .
  • Berndt v. Berndt 149 N.W. 287 Minn. 1914
  • Berndt v. Berndt 149 N.W. 287 Minn. 1914
    It is an old established rule that “to entitle a party to the specific performance of an alleged contract to convey real property, the contract must be clearly proved, and its terms should be so specific and distinct as to leave no reasonable doubt of their meaning.” Lanz v. McLaughlin, 14 Minn. 55 (72); Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; 2 Story, Eq.
  • Miller v. Miller 145 N.W. 615 Minn. 1914
  • Miller v. Miller 145 N.W. 615 Minn. 1914
    Lowe v. Lowe, 83 Minn. 206 ; 210, ; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; (2) a decision by the trial court of a question of fact will not be disturbed, if there is evidence reasonably tending to support it.
  • Lewis v. Johnson 143 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1913
  • Lewis v. Johnson 143 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1913
    290; Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Bastian Bros. Co. v. Wemott-Howard Co. 113 Minn. 196 , ; Minneapolis & St.
  • Bastian Bros. v. Wemott-Howard Co. 129 N.W. 369 Minn. 1911
  • Bastian Bros. v. Wemott-Howard Co. 129 N.W. 369 Minn. 1911
    Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414 , ; Ames & Frost Co. v. Smith, 65 Minn. 304 , ; Minneapolis & St.