Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Prescott v. Johnson, 97 N.W. 891.

26 citing documents.

Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , [1909]; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , [1884] ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , [1904] ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , [1905] ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , [1905].’’ Agner v. Bourn, 281 Minn. 385, 390 , .
Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; *391 Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , .
Leuba v. Bailey 88 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1957
Leuba v. Bailey 88 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1957
Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273, 275 , ; Storer’s Will, 28 Minn. 9 , .
Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
Rochester Loan & Trust Co. v. Pett 199 N.W. 1 Minn. 1924
Rochester Loan & Trust Co. v. Pett 199 N.W. 1 Minn. 1924
Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy, 135 Minn. 262 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , .
Boynton v. Simmons 194 N.W. 330 Minn. 1923
Boynton v. Simmons 194 N.W. 330 Minn. 1923
Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Gustafson v. Gustafson, 92 Minn. 139 , ; and see Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , .
McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
Mr. Justice Bunn, in Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , , said: “There is no reason for not applying the familiar rule that the party who seeks to set aside a solemn instrument like a deed on the ground of fraud or undue influence, which is a species of fraud, has the burden of proof.” Such is also the rule in Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , , and Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
Naeseth v. Hommedal 123 N.W. 287 Minn. 1909
Naeseth v. Hommedal 123 N.W. 287 Minn. 1909
Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , .
Rader v. Rader 121 N.W. 393 Minn. 1909
Rader v. Rader 121 N.W. 393 Minn. 1909
Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
Gustafson v. Gustafson 99 N.W. 631 Minn. 1904
Gustafson v. Gustafson 99 N.W. 631 Minn. 1904
Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .