Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian Knights, 92 N.W. 972.

29 citing documents.

McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
McCrae v. Brandt Aero Service 168 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1969
Co. 197 Minn. 205 , ; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge, 88 Minn. 224 , .
Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 87 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1957
Co. 162 Minn. 458 , ; Monahan v. Order of Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224 , .
Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n 54 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1952
Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n 54 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1952
But in Monahan v. Supreme Lodge, 88 Minn. 224 , ; Carson v. New York L. Ins.
Berg v. Sadler 50 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1951
Berg v. Sadler 50 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1951
Co. 197 Minn. 205 , ; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge, 88 Minn. 224 , .
Dougherty v. Holm 44 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1950
Green v. Schmahl 278 N.W. 157 Minn. 1938
Green v. Schmahl 278 N.W. 157 Minn. 1938
Co. 197 Minn. 205, 210 , , following Monahan v. Order of Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224 , .
Fine v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 274 N.W. 163 Minn. 1937
Fine v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 274 N.W. 163 Minn. 1937
Monahan v. Supreme Lodge O. C. K. 88 Minn. 224 , ; Carson v. New York L. Ins.
Lorentz v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 266 N.W. 699 Minn. 1936
Lorentz v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 266 N.W. 699 Minn. 1936
In Monahan v. Order of Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224, 230 , , this meaning to be given to the words “engage in an occupation,” as found in this policy, is approved : “The words 'folloiving any occupation’ mean something more than the doing of one or more acts pertaining thereto.
Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 245 N.W. 826 Minn. 1932
Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 245 N.W. 826 Minn. 1932
Aid Assn. 69 Minn. 14 , , 38 L. R. A. 537, 65 A. S. R. 542; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge O. C. K. 88 Minn. 224 , ; Hayes v. North American L. & C. Co. 151 Minn. 124 , ; Carson v. New York L. Ins.
Jones v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 207 N.W. 179 Minn. 1926
Jones v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 207 N.W. 179 Minn. 1926
542; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge O. C. K. 88 Minn. 224 , ; Collopy v. Modern B. of A. 133 Minn. 409 , ; McKay v. Minnesota C. M. Assn. 139 Minn. 192 , ; Hayes v. North Am.
Carson v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 209 Minn. 1925
Carson v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 209 Minn. 1925
The language of the policy here is practically the same as in Monahan v. Supreme Lodge O. of C. K. 88 Minn. 224, 230 , , and wherein the construction arrived at supports the claim that plaintiff has here proven his cause of action.
Hayes v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 186 N.W. 136 Minn. 1922
Hayes v. North American Life & Casualty Co. 186 N.W. 136 Minn. 1922
This rule was approved and applied in Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of O. C. K. 88 Minn. 224 , .
Abramovitz v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 159 N.W. 624 Minn. 1916
Abramovitz v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 159 N.W. 624 Minn. 1916
Cornfield v. Order Brith Abraham, 64 Minn. 261 , ; *304 Monahan v. Order Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224 , .
Collopy v. Modern Brotherhood 158 N.W. 625 Minn. 1916
Collopy v. Modern Brotherhood 158 N.W. 625 Minn. 1916
Considering the proof in the light of the construction placed upon a certificate, essentially the same as the one in the case at bar, in Monahan v. Order of Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224 , , we have no hesitancy in saying that the verdict for plaintiff finds ample support in the evidence.
Dechter v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 153 N.W. 742 Minn. 1915
Dechter v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 153 N.W. 742 Minn. 1915
Cornfield v. Order Brith Abraham, 64 Minn. 261 , ; Monahan v. Supreme Lodge Order of Columbian Knights, 88 Minn. 224 , .