DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fitger v. Guthrie, 94 N.W. 888.

37 citing documents.

  • Simon v. Larson 292 N.W. 270 Minn. 1940
  • Simon v. Larson 292 N.W. 270 Minn. 1940
    She relies on Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , 9á N. W. 888, as authority for that position.
  • Karnofsky v. Wells-Dickey Co. 237 N.W. 425 Minn. 1931
  • Karnofsky v. Wells-Dickey Co. 237 N.W. 425 Minn. 1931
    In Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , , the statute was applied and followed afterwards.
  • Jordan v. E. G. Caruthers State Bank 249 P. 549 Ariz. 1926
  • Nichols v. Atwood 149 N.W. 672 Minn. 1914
  • Nichols v. Atwood 149 N.W. 672 Minn. 1914
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , Poirier Mnfg.
  • Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
  • Buck v. Buck 142 N.W. 729 Minn. 1913
    66 ; Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 , .
  • Farris v. Koplau 129 N.W. 770 Minn. 1911
  • Farris v. Koplau 129 N.W. 770 Minn. 1911
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , .
  • National Citizens Bank v. Bowen 124 N.W. 241 Minn. 1910
  • National Citizens Bank v. Bowen 124 N.W. 241 Minn. 1910
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , .
  • Gay v. Kelley 123 N.W. 295 Minn. 1909
  • Gay v. Kelley 123 N.W. 295 Minn. 1909
    This decision was followed in Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , ; Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Hillestad v. Lee, 91 Minn. 335, 336 , ; Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 , ; Briggs v. Rutherford, 94 Minn. 23 , ; Merrill v. Pike, 94 Minn. 186 , ; Sather v. Sexton, 101 Minn. 544 , .
  • Law Reporting Co. v. H. Poehler & Co. 118 N.W. 664 Minn. 1908
  • Law Reporting Co. v. H. Poehler & Co. 118 N.W. 664 Minn. 1908
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , .
  • Sather v. Sexton 112 N.W. 1142 Minn. 1907
  • Sather v. Sexton 112 N.W. 1142 Minn. 1907
    7; Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 ; Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 ; Merrill v. Pike, 94 Minn. 186 ; Kolander v. Dunn, 95 Minn. 422 ; Hoatson v. McDonald, 97 Minn. 201 .
  • Hess v. Great Northern Railway Co. 108 N.W. 7 Minn. 1906
  • Hess v. Great Northern Railway Co. 108 N.W. 7 Minn. 1906
    laintiff’s appeal from the order granting a new trial is that it does not expressly appear therefrom that it was granted on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, and, as the record presents no errors in law to justify a new *201 trial, the order should be reversed and the verdict reinstated, under the rule in Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , , Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , , and Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 , .
  • Hoatson v. McDonald 106 N.W. 311 Minn. 1906
  • Hoatson v. McDonald 106 N.W. 311 Minn. 1906
    669 ; Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , ; Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 , ; Merrill v. Pike, 94 Minn. 186 , ; Kolander v. Dunn, 95 Minn. 422 , .
  • Bradley v. Bradley Estate Co. 106 N.W. 338 Minn. 1906
  • Bradley v. Bradley Estate Co. 106 N.W. 338 Minn. 1906
    Such being the case, the rule laid down in Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , , applies.
  • Kolander v. Dunn 104 N.W. 371 Minn. 1905
  • Kolander v. Dunn 104 N.W. 371 Minn. 1905
    This holding was followed in Berg v. Olson, 88 Minn. 392 , , and Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , , where the statute is fully discussed; Owens v. Savage, 93 Minn. 468 , ; Merrill v. Pike, 94 Minn. 186 , ; and perhaps other cases.
  • Merrill v. Pike 102 N.W. 393 Minn. 1905
  • Merrill v. Pike 102 N.W. 393 Minn. 1905
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Smith v. Minneapolis St.
  • Briggs v. Rutherford 101 N.W. 954 Minn. 1904
  • Briggs v. Rutherford 101 N.W. 954 Minn. 1904
    It not appearing affirmatively that the trial court granted a new trial in the exercise of its discretion (Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ), and, inasmuch as it clearly and conclusively appears *25 the verdict was sustained by the evidence, the order granting a new trial is reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to permit the plaintiff to amend her complaint so as to conform to the facts proved, and enter judgment on the verdict in
  • Owens v. Savage 101 N.W. 790 Minn. 1904
  • Owens v. Savage 101 N.W. 790 Minn. 1904
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Smith v. Minneapolis St.
  • Hillestad v. Lee 97 N.W. 1055 Minn. 1904
  • Hillestad v. Lee 97 N.W. 1055 Minn. 1904
    Laws 1901, p. 51 (c. 46); Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , ; Smith v. Minneapolis Street Ry.
  • Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 97 N.W. 881 Minn. 1904
  • Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 97 N.W. 881 Minn. 1904
    Fitger v. Guthrie, 89 Minn. 330 , .