DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stellmacher v. Bruder, 95 N.W. 324.

32 citing documents.

  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    But where the consideration of the contract is that the promisee shall assume a peculiar and domestic relation to the promisor, and render to him services of such a peculiar character that it is practically impossible to estimate their value by any pecuniary standard, specific performance will be decreed.” Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507, 509 , , 99 A. S. R. 609.
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , 509 , 95 N.W.
  • Matheson v. Gullickson 24 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
  • Matheson v. Gullickson 24 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1946
    nal or domestic services, and the services were only such as a sister would render to a brother without pay; Olsen v. Dixon, 165 Minn. 124 , 205 N. W, 955, involved absence of a peculiar personal or domestic relation; Chapel v. Chapel, 132 Minn. 86 , , involved absence of a peculiar personal relation, together with services of a nature compensable in damages; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 A. S. R. 609, involved peculiar personal domestic services but they were not rendered pursuant
  • Olsen v. Dixon 205 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
  • Olsen v. Dixon 205 N.W. 955 Minn. 1925
    Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
  • O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
    490; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , .
  • Smith v. Erlandson 199 N.W. 927 Minn. 1924
  • Smith v. Erlandson 199 N.W. 927 Minn. 1924
    Newton v. Newton, 46 Minn. 33 , ; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Whitman v. Dittman 191 N.W. 821 Minn. 1923
  • Whitman v. Dittman 191 N.W. 821 Minn. 1923
    Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Colby v. Street 178 N.W. 599 Minn. 1920
  • Colby v. Street 178 N.W. 599 Minn. 1920
    We think the facts alleged bring the case within the doctrine stated in Svanburg v. Fosseen, supra; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Greenfield v. Peterson 170 N.W. 696 Minn. 1919
  • Greenfield v. Peterson 170 N.W. 696 Minn. 1919
    Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Kins v. Ginzky 160 N.W. 868 Minn. 1917
  • Kins v. Ginzky 160 N.W. 868 Minn. 1917
    Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , *329 99 Am.
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
  • Odenbreit v. Utheim 154 N.W. 741 Minn. 1915
    490 ; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Robertson v. Corcoran 145 N.W. 812 Minn. 1914
  • Robertson v. Corcoran 145 N.W. 812 Minn. 1914
    490; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Brasch v. Reeves 144 N.W. 744 Minn. 1913
  • Brasch v. Reeves 144 N.W. 744 Minn. 1913
    The following cases illustrate the principles applicable: Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , ; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , ; Laird v. Vila, 93 Minn. 45 , ; Richardson v. Richardson, 114 Minn. 12 , ; Haubrich v. Haubrich, 118 Minn. 394 , .
  • Haubrich v. Haubrich 136 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
  • Haubrich v. Haubrich 136 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
    490; Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Richardson v. Richardson 130 N.W. 4 Minn. 1911
  • Richardson v. Richardson 130 N.W. 4 Minn. 1911
    Tbe result and the law which determines this case was stated in Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , , 99 Am.
  • Laird v. Vila 100 N.W. 656 Minn. 1904
  • Laird v. Vila 100 N.W. 656 Minn. 1904
    On the other hand, it was expressly held in Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , and reaffirmed in Stellmacher v. Bruder, 89 Minn. 507 , *49 , that the probate court is without, and the district court has, jurisdiction over actions for the specific performance of parol contracts for the conveyance of real and personal property.