Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 96 N.W. 41.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A purchaser who has “actual knowledge of facts which would 2 The department also cites Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 220, 96 N.W.
McCuen v. McCarvel 263 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1978
McCuen v. McCarvel 263 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1978
See, Buck v. City of Winona, 271 Minn. 145 , Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , 96 N.W.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF SAINT PAUL v. Fisher 145 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1966
In Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 223 , , we said that private property cannot be taken initially for a public purpose and later diverted for a private use.
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
This court in Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 223 , , said: “* * * Private property cannot be taken, under the Constitution and laws of this state * * * for a private use; and, if it be held that, after acquiring property for a public use, the legislature may divert it to a private use, in the manner shown in this case, it may do indirectly what
Kendrick v. City of St. Paul 6 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1942
Kendrick v. City of St. Paul 6 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1942
Lawton v. Joesting, 96 Minn. 163 , ; Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , ; City of Atlanta v. Jones, 135 Ga.
Penn-O-Tex Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 291 N.W. 131 Minn. 1940
Penn-O-Tex Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 291 N.W. 131 Minn. 1940
Co. 63 Minn. 330 , , , , 34 L. R. A. 184; Sanborn v. Van *312 Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , ; Nerlien v. Village of Brooten, 94 Minn. 361 , ; State ex rel.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
of Supervisors, 102 Minn. 442 , , 120 A. S. R. 640; Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 223 , ; City of St.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
640 ; Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , 223 , 96 N.W.
Pederson v. City of Rushford 177 N.W. 943 Minn. 1920
Pederson v. City of Rushford 177 N.W. 943 Minn. 1920
See Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , .
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
427 ; Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , ; Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 97 Minn. 429 , , 5 L.R.A.
Souther v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 136 N.W. 571 Minn. 1912
Souther v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 136 N.W. 571 Minn. 1912
Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 224 , ; Steenerson v. Fontaine, 106 Minn. 225 , .
Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 124 N.W. 1096 Minn. 1910
Betcher v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 124 N.W. 1096 Minn. 1910
Wait v. May, 48 Minn. 453 , ; Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215 , .
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
BROWN, J. The facts in this case are substantially like those presented in the case of Sanborn v. Van Duyne, 90 Minn. 215, 219 , ; but for a proper understanding of the present opinion a restatement is necessary.