Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co., 98 N.W. 344.

25 citing documents.

Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
2 Bredesen v. Nickolay, 147 Minn. 304 , ; Enkema v. McIntyre, 136 Minn. 293 , , 2 A. L. R. 411; Coates v. Cooper, 121 Minn. 11 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 A. S. R. 348; Buckley v. Patterson, 39 Minn. 250 , ; Austin v. Wacks, 30 Minn. 335 , .
Christensen v. Redman 66 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1954
Christensen v. Redman 66 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1954
As we said in Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451, 459 , , 346: u* * * Quite another question would arise if no fixed price had been established, and the agent was relied upon and expected to obtain the best figure possible * * There can be no quarrel with the rule that one acting in a fiduciary capacity must exercise the utmost fidelity in discharging h
In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33 60 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1953
(3 ed.) § 440; see, Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , .
Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
Turner v. Even, 160 Minn. 238 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
Zochrison v. Redemption Gold Corp. 274 N.W. 536 Minn. 1937
Olsen v. Danish Brotherhood in America 184 N.W. 178 Minn. 1921
Olsen v. Danish Brotherhood in America 184 N.W. 178 Minn. 1921
407; Selover v. *11 Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; State v. DeGroat, 109 Minn. 168 , , 134 Am.
Bredesen v. Nickolay 180 N.W. 547 Minn. 1920
Bredesen v. Nickolay 180 N.W. 547 Minn. 1920
Austin v. Wacks, 30 Minn. 335 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; Coates v. Cooper, 121 Minn. 11 , .
Model Clothing House v. Dickinson 178 N.W. 957 Minn. 1920
Model Clothing House v. Dickinson 178 N.W. 957 Minn. 1920
Although the facts are different, the case falls within the rule applied in Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; First Nat.
Nason v. Barrett 168 N.W. 581 Minn. 1918
Nason v. Barrett 168 N.W. 581 Minn. 1918
Co. 81 Minn. 259 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 91 Minn. 451 , ; First Nat.
Sherwood v. Lovett 129 N.W. 141 Minn. 1910
Sherwood v. Lovett 129 N.W. 141 Minn. 1910
Remple v. Hopkins, 101 Minn. 3 , ; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co., 91 Minn. 451 , .
State ex rel. Lake Shore Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. De Groat 123 N.W. 417 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Lake Shore Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. De Groat 123 N.W. 417 Minn. 1909
7 In Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co., 91 Minn. 451 , , this court held that an action might be maintained in Minnesota to compel a South Dakota corporation to issue and deliver to the plaintiff, a citizen of Minnesota, a certain proportion of its common stock pursuant to the provisions of a valid contract to that effect.
Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 111 N.W. 155 Minn. 1907
Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co. 111 N.W. 155 Minn. 1907
Wasser v. Western Land Securities Co. 107 N.W. 160 Minn. 1906
Wasser v. Western Land Securities Co. 107 N.W. 160 Minn. 1906
Rapalje, Real Est. Brokers, § 86; Selover v. Isle Harbor Land Co., 91 Minn. 451, 458 , ; Cox v. Haun, 127 Ind.