DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Prescott v. Johnson, 97 N.W. 891.

26 citing documents.

  • Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
  • Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , [1909]; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , [1884] ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , [1904] ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , [1905] ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , [1905].’’ Agner v. Bourn, 281 Minn. 385, 390 , .
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; *391 Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , .
  • Leuba v. Bailey 88 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1957
  • Leuba v. Bailey 88 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1957
    Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273, 275 , ; Storer’s Will, 28 Minn. 9 , .
  • Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
  • Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
    Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
  • Rochester Loan & Trust Co. v. Pett 199 N.W. 1 Minn. 1924
  • Rochester Loan & Trust Co. v. Pett 199 N.W. 1 Minn. 1924
    Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy, 135 Minn. 262 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , .
  • Boynton v. Simmons 194 N.W. 330 Minn. 1923
  • Boynton v. Simmons 194 N.W. 330 Minn. 1923
    Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
  • Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
  • Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
    Graham v. Burch, 44 Minn. 33 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
    Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Gustafson v. Gustafson, 92 Minn. 139 , ; and see Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , .
  • McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
  • McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
    Mr. Justice Bunn, in Howard v. Farr, 115 Minn. 86 , , said: “There is no reason for not applying the familiar rule that the party who seeks to set aside a solemn instrument like a deed on the ground of fraud or undue influence, which is a species of fraud, has the burden of proof.” Such is also the rule in Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , , and Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
  • Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
  • Howard v. Farr 131 N.W. 1071 Minn. 1911
    Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
  • Naeseth v. Hommedal 123 N.W. 287 Minn. 1909
  • Naeseth v. Hommedal 123 N.W. 287 Minn. 1909
    Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , .
  • Rader v. Rader 121 N.W. 393 Minn. 1909
  • Rader v. Rader 121 N.W. 393 Minn. 1909
    Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .
  • Gustafson v. Gustafson 99 N.W. 631 Minn. 1904
  • Gustafson v. Gustafson 99 N.W. 631 Minn. 1904
    Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , .